22-3664 group assembly: ” Packaging paper cutter ” Do a good job of product infringement self-inspection quickly! David, a black-hearted law firm, initiated a complaint, causing a large number of sellers to encounter TRO.

TRO: The full name is Temporary Restraining Order.

There are generally two kinds of intellectual property infringement. The first kind is that the right holder complains directly on Amazon platform, and the infringer’s Amazon store background performance notice and email address will receive the infringement warning notice sent by the notice team.

Some are just warnings, and some customers receive the first warning of infringement, that is, freezing the mail. This kind of situation is rare for sellers, and it is generally common in relatively big-name infringement complaints.

Another type of infringement notice is that the obligee entrusts the law firm to directly sue in the local federal court, so that the court can directly issue a temporary restraining order (TRO) and/or other injunctions.

Because TRO has given enough deterrence to intellectual property infringers, it has also caused heavy losses to businesses that have strayed into the infringement restricted area. Generally, all the common agency laws are GBC, Keith, SMG, EPS,David, etc. These laws are quite malicious in the eyes of China sellers.

At present, the author of this article has encountered the following cases, hoping to form a group to compete with the plaintiff, and both settlement and litigation can be done:

RO CONTACT DETAILS:

Little ELF Products, Inc. (22-3664)

c/o David Gulbransen,

Law Offices of David Gulbransen

805 Lake Street, Suite 172,

Oak Park, Illinois 60301

312-361-0825

lawsuit@gulbransenlaw.com

It’s really not easy to make money in Amazon these days. American “dirty” law firms frequently file lawsuits in Amazon and fishing law enforcement, all of which are in Illinois. Many sellers feel that Amazon is becoming more and more difficult to do.

Of the 26 brands represented by David, the Little ELF paper cutter was written by a lawyer, and the case number was 2022-cv-03664, which was initiated on July 14th of this month. At present, the case dynamics have not been updated on July 18th, and the specific list of complained sellers has not been announced. It is estimated that the list will not come down until the PIO stage. I believe that many sellers have found lawyers who want to settle, and some products on the shelves have to check themselves quickly. Xiao Bian hopes that our sellers in China will unite to collectively respond to the lawsuit. There was also a case before, and lawyers were asked to share about $100 per seller according to the proportion of frozen funds, which is lower than the settlement. It seems that the minimum settlement fee of this law firm is not less than $1,000. If the respondent is likely to withdraw the lawsuit, the case mentioned “December 2, In the first court hearing, 105 China sellers jointly fought against DAVID Law Firm in the United States. The plaintiff’s lawyer was stunned in court and was completely unprepared for the unity and car-scrapping of China sellers. Finally, the plaintiff’s lawyer announced the withdrawal of the 524 sellers whose wedding dress industry was frozen. ” Zhihu tweeted about it.

The product infringed by the defendant is similar in appearance to this product. The defendant is basically the one on the right, but the defendant is not exactly the same as the plaintiff’s product. Some sellers listed several differences.

I also hope that the defendant sellers will gather together, connect one by one and build a group to fight against David’s law firm. I hope that people who see the post will help forward it and fight against David’s black-hearted law firm.

The latest development of the case: