2025-cv-13115 +组团 近期案件➥ 订阅
原告律所：Donigerlawfirm
品牌：密封版权
小提示：专注TRO和解/应诉，需要起诉文件/被告名单/其他帮助可联系我们，微信右上角“···”可全文翻译/分享找队友/订阅可自动推送此案最新进展
微信扫码联系我们
| # | Date | Description |
| 16 |
02/09/2026
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to seal [21] but denies without prejudice Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order [22] because it is not clear that this Court may exercise personal jurisdiction over Defendants. Plaintiff previously appeared to allege that personal jurisdiction exists here based upon Defendants' sales to Illinois residents, not simply based upon their maintenance of interactive websites through which Illinois residents can, in theory, purchase infringing products. In their motion, however, Plaintiff represents that "each of the Defendants appear ready and willing to ship the Infringing Products to Illinois." [22-1] at 9. Before this Court will consider the extraordinary relief Plaintiff seeks, it must clarify the factual and legal bases justifying the exercise of personal jurisdiction over the identified foreign defendants. The mere maintenance of a website accessible in Illinois remains insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction. See, e.g., Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass'n, Inc. v. The Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 93435 (N.D. Ill. 2016) (simply alleging the existence of purported counterfeiting via an interactive website is not enough, by itself, to confer personal jurisdiction); Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc., 751 F.3d 796, 803 (7th Cir. 2014) ("Having an interactive website. should not open a defendant up to personal jurisdiction in every spot on the planet where that interactive website is accessible."); Rubik's Brand, Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 20-CV-5338, 2021 WL 825668, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2021) (screenshot evidence showing that an order could be placed by an Illinoisan, "amounts to nothing more than maintaining an interactive website that is accessible in Illinois," and "that alone cannot confer personal jurisdiction."). Moreover, any sales to Illinois must go beyond Plaintiff's test buys made in connection with this case. See, e.g., Walden v. Fiore, 571 U.S. 277, 285 (2014) ("the plaintiff cannot be the only link between the defendant and the forum"); Expeditee LLC v. Entities Listed on Exhibit 1, No. 21 C 6440, 2022 WL 1556381, at *4 (N.D. Ill. May 17, 2022) ("Plaintiff claims that, as part of its preliminary investigation, it purchased infringing products from the Moving Defendants that the Moving Defendants shipped to Chicago. Such sales on their own are insufficient for the purposes of personal jurisdiction, for Plaintiff has not identified evidence of any transactions involving an allegedly counterfeit product between the Moving Defendants and Illinois customers, other than the 'test buys.'"). The 2/11/26 Notice of Motion date is stricken as to all motions. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 15 |
02/06/2026
|
Sealed Motion 翻译 |
| 14 |
02/06/2026
|
Seal 翻译 |
| 13 |
01/05/2026
|
ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 1/5/2026: Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 12 |
12/31/2025
|
Local Rule 3.2 Annual Reminder Order 翻译 |
| 11 |
12/02/2025
|
Order on Motion to Seal 翻译 |
| 10 |
11/20/2025
|
Sealed Motion 翻译 |
| 9 |
11/20/2025
|
Seal 翻译 |
| 8 |
10/28/2025
|
JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge 翻译 |
| 7 |
10/28/2025
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. 翻译 |
| 6 |
10/28/2025
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). 翻译 |
| 5 |
10/28/2025
|
MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC 翻译 |
| 4 |
10/27/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Texco, Inc. by Trevor William Barrett 翻译 |
| 3 |
10/27/2025
|
CIVIL Cover Sheet 翻译 |
| 2 |
10/27/2025
|
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Texco, Inc. -- (Unredacted) Complaint 翻译 |
| 1 |
10/27/2025
|
COMPLAINT filed by Texco, Inc.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24260764. 翻译 |