2025-cv-11255 +组团 近期案件➥ 订阅
原告律所：Bayramoglu Law
品牌：Rotita 版权
小提示：专注TRO和解/应诉，需要起诉文件/被告名单/其他帮助可联系我们，微信右上角“···”可全文翻译/分享找队友/订阅可自动推送此案最新进展
微信扫码联系我们
| # | Date | Description |
| 35 |
12/17/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Minute entry [32] is amended as follows: Defendant has not responded to Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion [28] is granted. Based on the evidence previously submitted by Plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, Plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The infringement of Plaintiff's marks irreparably harms Plaintiff and confuses the public. Because this infringement was willful and considering the value of Plaintiff's brand as well as the need to deter infringement that is easily committed and difficult to stop, the Court concludes that $5,000.00 is an appropriate award of statutory damages against Defendant. However, treble damages and attorney's fees are not warranted because Plaintiff has not met its burden of establishing the requisite level of willfulness to warrant that additional relief. See Kenall Mfg. Co. v. Cooper Lighting, LLC, 723 F. Supp. 3d 640, 656 (N.D. Ill. 2024) ("[T]o establish willfulness, a patentee must show that the accused infringer had a specific intent to infringe at the time of the challenged conduct."). Enter Final Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (gel,) 翻译 |
| 34 |
12/17/2025
|
MAILED Copyright report with certified copy of minute order dated 12/16/2025 to Registrar, Washington DC 翻译 |
| 33 |
12/16/2025
|
DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 12/16/2025. Mailed notice (gel,) 翻译 |
| 32 |
12/16/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Defendant has not responded to Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion 28 is granted. Based on the evidence previously submitted by Plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, Plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The infringement of Plaintiff's marks irreparably harms Plaintiff and confuses the public. Because this infringement was willful and considering the value of Plaintiff's brand as well as the need to deter infringement that is easily committed and difficult to stop, the Court concludes that $5,000.00 is an appropriate award of statutory damages against Defendant. Enter Final Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (gel,) 翻译 |
| 31 |
12/04/2025
|
CERTIFICATE of Service in Compliance with Docket 30 by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn on behalf of Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited regarding order on motion for default judgment, set deadlines, [30] 翻译 |
| 30 |
12/03/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's motion for default and default judgment [28] is granted in part as to the request for entry of default. Plaintiff has shown that Defendant MIRAJ ENTERPRISES was served on 11/7/25 and failed to plead or otherwise defend this action by 11/28/25 [27]. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), default is entered against Defendant MIRAJ ENTERPRISES. Plaintiff's motion is entered and continued as to the request for entry of a default judgment. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment are due by 12/9/25. If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve a copy of this order on defaulted Defendant within one business day of entry and promptly file proof of such service. The motion hearing set for 12/17/25 [29] is stricken. Mailed notice (gel,) 翻译 |
| 29 |
12/01/2025
|
Plaintiff's NOTICE of Motion by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn for presentment of motion for default judgment, [28] before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 12/17/2025 at 10:00 AM. 翻译 |
| 28 |
12/01/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for default judgment as to Defendant MIRAJ ENTERPRISES 翻译 |
| 27 |
11/07/2025
|
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited as to MIRAJ ENTERPRISES on 11/7/2025, answer due 11/28/2025. 翻译 |
| 26 |
10/30/2025
|
SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant MIRAJ ENTERPRISES 翻译 |
| 25 |
10/30/2025
|
SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) MIRAJ ENTERPRISES by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited 翻译 |
| 24 |
10/30/2025
|
ORDER AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC SERVICE Signed by the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 10/30/2025. Mailed notice (gel,) 翻译 |
| 23 |
10/30/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's motion for electronic service [21] is granted. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective way to communicate with online marketplace defendants. Enter Order Authorizing Electronic Service of Process. Motion hearing set for 11/4/25 [22] is stricken. A status report regarding next steps is due by 12/4/25, if other appropriate relief has not been sought by that date. Mailed notice (gel,) 翻译 |
| 22 |
10/29/2025
|
Plaintiff's NOTICE of Motion by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn for presentment of motion for service by publication, [21] before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 11/4/2025 at 10:00 AM. 翻译 |
| 21 |
10/29/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for service by publication and Electronic Service 翻译 |
| 20 |
10/09/2025
|
ORDER AUTHORIZING EXPEDITED DISCOVERY Signed by the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 10/9/2025. Mailed notice (gel,) 翻译 |
| 19 |
10/09/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's renewed motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery 17 is granted. The Court finds that expedited discovery is warranted to obtain Defendant's contact information. Enter Order Authorizing Expedited Discovery. The motion hearing set for 10/14/25 18 is stricken. If no other relief has been sought, Plaintiff is ordered to file a status report by 10/30/25 updating the Court on the progress of expedited discovery and proposed next steps in the case. Mailed notice (gel,) 翻译 |
| 18 |
10/08/2025
|
Plaintiff's NOTICE of Motion by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn for presentment of motion for order, 17 before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 10/14/2025 at 10:00 AM. 翻译 |
| 17 |
10/08/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for order for Expedited Discovery RENEWED 翻译 |
| 16 |
10/08/2025
|
FIRST AMENDED complaint by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited against MIRAJ ENTERPRISES and terminating The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A for Copyright Infringement 翻译 |
| 15 |
10/01/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge LaShonda A. Hunt. On 9/17/25, Plaintiff filed a redacted complaint with three exhibits under seal 1, which included the copyright information and a Schedule A listing 7 defendants. Plaintiff also filed a motion for leave to file under seal 4, a sealed exhibit to the declaration of K. Kuhn 5, and a motion for leave to conduct excited discovery 13. Upon review of the copyright infringement complaint and other filings, the Court questions whether Plaintiff has established sufficient grounds for joinder of all 7 defendants under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20. See Viking Arm AS v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A,No. 24 C 1566, 2024 WL 2953105 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Indeed, Plaintiff filed a form complaint with generic allegations about coordinated counterfeiting activity between 7 defendants without any details whatsoever, which arguably violates the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 10. Accordingly, by 10/8/25, Plaintiff must file either a memorandum explaining why joinder is proper or an amended complaint specifically naming and identifying each defendant being sued and setting forth with more than conclusory statements the alleged infringing activity. Failure to do so will result in the current complaint being dismissed without prejudice and this case being closed. Furthermore, Plaintiff has not established good cause under Local Rule 26.2 or Seventh Circuit precedent to justify sealing the names of defendants or documents pertaining to alleged infringing activity. "Secrecy makes little sense if the goal of the litigation is to protect rightholders' IP interests by obtaining an injunction against defendants' sales of infringing or counterfeit goods." See Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 25 C 2937, 2025 WL 2299593 at *7 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2025) (Kness, J.). More importantly, this presumption of sealing runs counter to the well-established authority of this Circuit holding that "[m]any a litigant would prefer that the subject matter of a case. be kept from the curious (including its business rivals and customers), but the tradition that litigation is open to the public is of very long standing." See Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Leavell, 220 F.3d 562, 567-68 (7th Cir. 2000). For those reasons, the motion for leave to file under seal 4 is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal the document filed at 2 and 5. Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery 13 is denied without prejudice to renewal if this case proceeds. The motion hearing set for 10/2/25 14 is stricken. Mailed notice (gel,) 翻译 |
| 14 |
09/22/2025
|
Plaintiff's NOTICE of Motion by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn for presentment of motion for order, 13, motion to seal, 4 before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 10/2/2025 at 10:00 AM. 翻译 |
| 13 |
09/22/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for order for Expedited Discovery 翻译 |
| 12 |
09/18/2025
|
MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC 翻译 |
| 11 |
09/17/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Gokalp Bayramoglu 翻译 |
| 10 |
09/17/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu 翻译 |
| 9 |
09/17/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu 翻译 |
| 8 |
09/17/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joseph Wendell Droter 翻译 |
| 7 |
09/17/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn 翻译 |
| 6 |
09/17/2025
|
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited 翻译 |
| 5 |
09/17/2025
|
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of K. Kuhn regarding MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited to seal 4. 翻译 |
| 4 |
09/17/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited to seal 翻译 |
| 3 |
09/17/2025
|
CIVIL Cover Sheet 翻译 |
| 2 |
09/17/2025
|
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited Complaint for Copyright Infringement regarding complaint, 1. 翻译 |
| 1 |
09/17/2025
|
COMPLAINT for Copyright Infringement filed by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24074729. 翻译 |