2025-cv-10827 +组团 近期案件➥ 订阅
原告律所：David
品牌：POWERBALL 腕力球
小提示：专注TRO和解/应诉，需要起诉文件/被告名单/其他帮助可联系我们，微信右上角“···”可全文翻译/分享找队友/订阅可自动推送此案最新进展
微信扫码联系我们
| # | Date | Description |
| 34 |
03/03/2026
|
ENTERED JUDGMENT. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 33 |
03/03/2026
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff has submitted a response to the Court's show cause order, see [30]. Plaintiff claims in its response that it amended its complaint in this case because it realized its evidence regarding joinder "was not reliable"; it does not explain why it failed to evaluate that evidence before filing its initial complaint. And the claimed "realization" does not explain its prior decision to sue 363 defendants and then drop all but one when Judge Harjani expressed concerns about the propriety of joinder. See Pure Body Logistics, Inc. v. Partnerships, No. 1:25-cv-08797 [13], [16], [17]. In fact, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed 362 defendants from Judge Harjani's case on 9/4/25 based upon concerns about joinder, and then filed this action five days later naming those same defendants. Plaintiff's litigation conduct thus undermines its suggestion that it had a reasonable factual and legal basis to join the defendants in this case. Repeatedly naming the exact same group or subgroup of defendants in new cases until a case is assigned to a judge the Plaintiff believes to be hospitable to Plaintiff's own theory of joinder constitutes a willful abuse of the judicial process. If Plaintiff had a good faith factual and legal basis to join these defendants, it could have pressed its position in the prior case before Judge Harjani (and appealed in due course if appropriate), but it declined to do so. Instead, when challenged, Plaintiff cut and ran, then filed a new suit, seeking to join the same parties based upon the same allegations. That strategy not only constitutes an egregious form of forum shopping, but it also consumes scarce judicial resources, as Plaintiff asks judge after judge to make the same exact determination, hoping for a more favorable outcome. Based upon Plaintiff's abuse of the judicial process, the Court dismisses this case with prejudice. See, e.g., Fuery v. City of Chicago, 900 F.3d 450, 452 (7th Cir. 2018) (quoting Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger, 581 U.S. 101, 107 (2017) ("District courts 'possess certain inherent powers, not conferred by rule or statute, to manage their own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases. That authority includes the ability to fashion an appropriate sanction for conduct which abuses the judicial process.' "); Salmeron v. Enter. Recovery Sys., Inc., 579 F.3d 787, 793 (7th Cir. 2009) ("Sanctions meted out pursuant to the court's inherent power are appropriate where the offender has willfully abused the judicial process or otherwise conducted litigation in bad faith"; "though particularly severe, the sanction of dismissal is within the court's discretion."); In re Shao, No. 1:23-CV-13808, 2025 WL 933807, at *4 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 26, 2025) (dismissing bankruptcy appeal based upon the debtor's "egregious forum shopping"); Julie Stiebritz v. The Partnerships, No. 1:25-cv-03459 [19] (N.D. Ill. Apr. 9, 2025) (dismissing case for the same abuse of the judicial process). Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 32 |
02/27/2026
|
RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause to terminate deadlines and hearings, [29] 翻译 |
| 31 |
02/17/2026
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff's supplemental report suggests that Plaintiff has named the identified defendants in at least one prior lawsuit and dismissed all but one of those defendants to avoid an unfavorable joinder ruling. See [27]; see also Pure Body Logistics v. The Partnerships, Case. No. 25-cv-8797. Repeatedly naming the same group of defendants in new cases until a case is assigned to a judge the plaintiff believes to be hospitable to joinder constitutes egregious forum shopping and an abuse of judicial process. Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing by 2/27/26, why this case should not be dismissed. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 30 |
12/31/2025
|
ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/31/2025: Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 29 |
11/12/2025
|
SUPPLEMENT to order on motion for temporary restraining order, order on motion to seal document, terminate deadlines and hearings, 26 翻译 |
| 28 |
11/12/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint naming just one defendant, see 18, 19 and thereby avoiding any joinder issues. But before Plaintiff may proceed, it must file a supplemental report confirming whether it has previously named any of the 371 defendants identified in this case in a prior case asserting infringement of the same trademark. See Julie Stiebritz v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 1:25-cv-03459, at 19 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 9, 2025) (dismissing the case because plaintiff previously named defendants in a prior case and dismissed them to avoid an unfavorable joinder ruling, which constitutes forum shopping). Plaintiff shall file the report by 11/20/25. The Court takes under advisement Plaintiff's motions for temporary restraining order 20 and to seal 23 and strikes the 11/12/25 Notice of Motion date as to both motions. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 27 |
11/11/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. by Stephen Jay Judge 翻译 |
| 26 |
11/03/2025
|
NOTICE of Motion by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr for presentment of motion for temporary restraining order 20, motion to seal document 23 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 11/12/2025 at 11:00 AM. 翻译 |
| 25 |
11/03/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. to seal document sealed document 19, sealed document 22 翻译 |
| 24 |
11/03/2025
|
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. Exhibit 1 to Delcaration of David Gulbransen 翻译 |
| 23 |
11/03/2025
|
MEMORANDUM by Pure Body Logistics, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order 20 翻译 |
| 22 |
11/03/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. for temporary restraining order 翻译 |
| 21 |
11/03/2025
|
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. Schedule A to Amended Complaint 翻译 |
| 20 |
11/03/2025
|
AMENDED complaint by Pure Body Logistics, Inc. against Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A 翻译 |
| 19 |
10/14/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit by filing a single trademark infringement complaint naming 371 separate defendants, see 1, 2. Once the case was assigned to this Court, ostensibly to avoid having to demonstrate the propriety of joining hundreds of defendants in a single suit, Plaintiff filed an amended Schedule A, which names just one defendant, see 10. But the complaint remains drafted as if it still targets multiple defendants. Given the disconnect and ambiguity, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint 1 and denies without prejudice the pending motions for injunctive relief 11, for leave to seal 7, 14, and for leave to file excess pages 15. The 10/15/25 Notice of Motion date is stricken as to all motions. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed, it must file a complaint consistent with the rules of procedure, including Rule 11. Finally, counsel's appearance form indicates that he is a member of the Court's general bar, but not the trial bar; counsel must ensure strict compliance with LR 83.12. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 18 |
10/06/2025
|
NOTICE of Motion by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr for presentment of motion to seal document 14, motion for temporary restraining order 11, motion to seal document 7, motion for leave to file excess pages 15 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 10/15/2025 at 11:00 AM. 翻译 |
| 17 |
10/06/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. for leave to file excess pages 翻译 |
| 16 |
10/06/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. to seal document sealed document 13 翻译 |
| 15 |
10/06/2025
|
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. Exhibit 1 to Delcaration of David Gulbransen 翻译 |
| 14 |
10/06/2025
|
MEMORANDUM by Pure Body Logistics, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order 11 翻译 |
| 13 |
10/06/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. for temporary restraining order 翻译 |
| 12 |
09/30/2025
|
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. Revised Schedule A 翻译 |
| 11 |
09/10/2025
|
MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials 翻译 |
| 10 |
09/10/2025
|
MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA 翻译 |
| 9 |
09/09/2025
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. 翻译 |
| 8 |
09/09/2025
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Laura K. McNally. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). 翻译 |
| 7 |
09/09/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. to seal document sealed document 2 翻译 |
| 6 |
09/09/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr 翻译 |
| 5 |
09/09/2025
|
Affiliate Disclosure by Pure Body Logistics, Inc. 翻译 |
| 4 |
09/09/2025
|
USPTO Cover Sheet by Pure Body Logistics, Inc. 翻译 |
| 3 |
09/09/2025
|
CIVIL Cover Sheet 翻译 |
| 2 |
09/09/2025
|
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. Schedule A to Complaint 翻译 |
| 1 |
09/09/2025
|
COMPLAINT filed by Pure Body Logistics, Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24034785. 翻译 |