2025-cv-09740 +组团 近期案件➥ 订阅
原告律所：HSP
品牌：MOTOGP 世界摩托车锦标赛
小提示：专注TRO和解/应诉，需要起诉文件/被告名单/其他帮助可联系我们，微信右上角“···”可全文翻译/分享找队友/订阅可自动推送此案最新进展
微信扫码联系我们
| # | Date | Description |
| 15 |
08/18/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: The plaintiff's motion to seal 8 is denied. "The court may for good cause shown enter an order directing that one or more documents be filed under seal." L.R. 26.2(b). "[A] district court must be sensitive to the rights of the public in determining whether any particular document, or class of documents, is appropriately filed under seal." United States v. Corbitt, 879 F.2d 224, 228 (7th Cir. 1989). Here, the plaintiff seeks to seal the identities of the 119 defendants. The plaintiff argues that it intends to seek temporary ex parte relief and that sealing is necessary to prevent the defendants from learning of these proceedings prior to execution of the temporary restraining order. The plaintiff claims that the defendants would destroy evidence and hide or transfer assets, which would frustrate the plaintiff's ability to secure relief. But the plaintiff has not presented any evidence to support these claims. And the Court declines to join in the plaintiff's rampant speculation. Therefore, the Court denies the motion to seal. In fact, the plaintiff's claims are so speculative and generalized that the Court questions whether the plaintiff conducted an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances and whether the factual contentions have any evidentiary support. Consequently, the Court orders the plaintiff to show cause why it has not violated Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b) by making generalized assertions not specific to the defendants named in this lawsuit. The rule to show cause hearing is set for September 2, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 14 |
08/18/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: The plaintiff has filed a complaint alleging infringement by 119 defendants. This case follows a pattern common to "Schedule A" cases where plaintiffs allege that defendants employ similar methods to infringe plaintiffs' intellectual property. But experience has shown that this is often not the case. More importantly, experience has shown that joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 is rarely appropriate in Schedule A cases. See, e.g., Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 9401, Dkt. 27 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 18, 2024). Accordingly, the Court raises the propriety of joinder and requires the plaintiff to file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder on or before August 29, 2025. Alternatively, by the same date, the plaintiff may file an amended complaint naming one or more defendants; however, if the plaintiff names multiple defendants, the plaintiff must show that joinder of those defendants is proper. All pending motions are hereby stayed pending resolution of the joinder issue. Further, should the plaintiff (1) file an amended complaint naming fewer defendants in this case, (2) file a separate complaint naming one or more of the remaining defendants originally named in this case, and (3) assert the same claims against those defendants, the Court reminds the plaintiff of Local Rule 40.3(b)(2), which requires the plaintiff to indicate the number of the this case and the name of the judge to whom it was assigned. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 13 |
08/15/2025
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. 翻译 |
| 12 |
08/15/2025
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). 翻译 |
| 11 |
08/15/2025
|
Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Dorna Sports, S.L. 翻译 |
| 10 |
08/15/2025
|
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Dorna Sports, S.L. 翻译 |
| 9 |
08/15/2025
|
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Dorna Sports, S.L. Sealed Schedule A 翻译 |
| 8 |
08/15/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Dorna Sports, S.L. to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal 翻译 |
| 7 |
08/15/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dorna Sports, S.L. by Elizabeth Aubree Miller 翻译 |
| 6 |
08/15/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dorna Sports, S.L. by John Wilson 翻译 |
| 5 |
08/15/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dorna Sports, S.L. by Robert Payton Mcmurray 翻译 |
| 4 |
08/15/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dorna Sports, S.L. by William Benjamin Kalbac 翻译 |
| 3 |
08/15/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dorna Sports, S.L. by Michael A. Hierl 翻译 |
| 2 |
08/15/2025
|
CIVIL Cover Sheet 翻译 |
| 1 |
08/15/2025
|
COMPLAINT filed by Dorna Sports, S.L.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23889451. 翻译 |