2025-cv-09550 案件实时进展-美国TRO临时禁令冻结案

2025-cv-09550 +组团 近期案件➥ 订阅

原告律所：Sullivan & Carter，LLP

品牌：Mini Minder 整理器

小提示：专注TRO和解/应诉，需要起诉文件/被告名单/其他帮助可联系我们，微信右上角“···”可全文翻译/分享找队友/订阅可自动推送此案最新进展

微信扫码联系我们

-cv-

#	Date	Description
17	09/30/2025	MOTION by Plaintiff Lemonwood, Inc. for preliminary injunction 翻译
16	09/19/2025	SEALED Temporary Restraining Order Signed by the Honorable Georgia N. Alexakis on 9/19/25. 翻译
15	09/19/2025	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Georgia N. Alexakis: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for entry of a temporary restraining order, a temporary asset restraint (up to $6,979), and expedited discovery [11] is granted. Plaintiff's ex parte motion for electronic service of process [14] is also granted. No appearance is required on 9/22/25. Based on plaintiff's written submissions, the Court finds that plaintiff has established (1) a likelihood of success on the merits; (2) the harm to plaintiff is irreparable and cannot be fully compensated by money damages; (3) an injunction is in the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit goods and infringement interferes with plaintiff's ability to control its intellectual property; and (4) there is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Plaintiff's written submissions also establish that if defendants were informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, assets representing proceeds from the sale of the infringing products would likely be redirected, defeating plaintiff's interests in stopping the infringement and obtaining an accounting. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendant and implement the asset freeze. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective way to communicate with these online marketplace defendants. The Court decides these motions, though, without the benefit of adversarial presentation. If defendant were to appear and object, the Court is willing revisit issues related to, among other topics, the asset restraint, personal jurisdiction, and electronic service of process. A $1,000 bond is sufficient to secure the injunctive relief. Enter order, as modified by the Court. 翻译
14	09/16/2025	MOTION by Plaintiff Lemonwood, Inc. for electronic service of process 翻译
13	09/16/2025	MOTION by Plaintiff Lemonwood, Inc. for temporary restraining order 翻译
12	08/28/2025	SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff XYZ Corporation Amended Schedule A 翻译
11	08/14/2025	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Georgia N. Alexakis: The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal the complaint at Dkt. 2 and the exhibit at Dkt. 2-1 and to amend the plaintiff's name in the case caption of the electronic docket from "XYZ Corporation" to "Lemonwood, Inc." Plaintiff has not rebutted the presumption that its complaint, identity, and intellectual property rights should be filed publicly. Plaintiff has not identified any statute, rule, or privilege that justifies confidentiality. See In re Specht, 622 F.3d 697, 701 (7th Cir. 2010) ("Documents that affect the disposition of federal litigation are presumptively open to public view, even if the litigants strongly prefer secrecy, unless a statute, rule, or privilege justifies confidentiality."); City of Greenville, Ill. v. Syngenta Crop Prot., LLC, 764 F.3d 695, 697 (7th Cir. 2014) ("[L]itigants who enjoy publicly subsidized dispute resolution should expect public oversight."). And with respect to pseudonyms, the Seventh Circuit has "repeatedly voiced [its] disfavor of parties proceeding anonymously, as anonymous litigation runs contrary to the rights of the public to have open judicial proceedings and to know who is using court facilities and procedures funded by public taxes." See Doe v. Vill. of Deerfield, 819 F.3d 372, 376-77 (7th Cir. 2016). "To proceed anonymously, a party must demonstrate 'exceptional circumstances' that outweigh both the public policy in favor of identified parties and the prejudice to the opposing party that would result from anonymity." Id. Here, plaintiff has failed to demonstrate "exceptional circumstances." In addition, upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the propriety of joining 308 defendants in a single action. By 8/28/25, plaintiff must file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of this Court's orders in Bug Art Limited v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 7777, Dkt. 28 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 28, 2024), and Anagram International v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12194, Dkt. 87 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 21, 2025). In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by 8/28/25 with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining why that smaller subset of defendants is properly joined. No motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order should be filed in this matter without counsel first consulting this Court's order in Wham-O Holding v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12523, Dkt. 39 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2025). 翻译
10	08/14/2025	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Georgia N. Alexakis: Initial status hearing is set for 10/27/25 at 9:30 a.m. in person in Courtroom 1719. By 10/20/25, the parties shall file a Joint Initial Status Report that complies with the Court's standing order, which can be found on the Court's website. If the defendant(s) have not been served by the initial status hearing date, counsel for Plaintiff must contact the Courtroom Deputy to reschedule the status hearing and the date for filing the Joint Initial Status Report. 翻译
9	08/13/2025	ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff XYZ Corporation by John Joseph Mariane, IV 翻译
8	08/13/2025	ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff XYZ Corporation by Gouthami Vanam Tufts 翻译
7	08/13/2025	CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. 翻译
6	08/13/2025	CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Georgia N. Alexakis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Laura K. McNally. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). 翻译
5	08/12/2025	ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff XYZ Corporation by Ann Marie Sullivan (Sullivan, Ann Marie) 翻译
4	08/12/2025	ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff XYZ Corporation by Alison K Carter 翻译
3	08/12/2025	CIVIL Cover Sheet 翻译
2	08/12/2025	SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff XYZ Corporation Complaint (Unredacted) 翻译
1	08/12/2025	COMPLAINT (Redacted) filed by XYZ Corporation; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23870593. 翻译