2025-cv-07242 +组团 近期案件➥ 订阅
原告律所：Bayramoglu Law Offices LLC
品牌：Rotita 版权
小提示：专注TRO和解/应诉，需要起诉文件/被告名单/其他帮助可联系我们，微信右上角“···”可全文翻译/分享找队友/订阅可自动推送此案最新进展
微信扫码联系我们
| # | Date | Description |
| 51 |
03/03/2026
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff has moved for default judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) against defendant TICTICMISS Fashion. Defendant is ordered to show cause by 3/10/2026 as to why default judgment should not be entered or it will face default judgment. Plaintiff is directed to promptly serve this order on defendants and file a certificate of service. If defendant does not respond by the deadline above, then by 3/12/2026, plaintiff should file a status report noting the lack of response. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 50 |
02/25/2026
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for default judgment as to Defendant TICTICMISS Fashion 翻译 |
| 49 |
02/25/2026
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant TICTICMISS Fashion has not objected to Plaintiff's motion for entry of a default [42] or responded to this court's order to respond to the motion [44]. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), the court hereby enters a finding of default against Defendant. Defendant is warned that further failure to respond will result in a default judgment. As a reminder, plaintiff and any appearing parties should file an updated status report by 3/11/2026. See [43]. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 48 |
02/23/2026
|
STATUS Report in compliance with Docket No. 44 by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited 翻译 |
| 47 |
02/13/2026
|
CERTIFICATE of Service in compliance with Docket No. 44 by Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu on behalf of Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited regarding set deadlines, [44] 翻译 |
| 46 |
02/13/2026
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff has moved for entry of default under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) against defendant TICTICMISS Fashion. Defendant is ordered to show cause by 2/20/2026 as to why default should not be entered or they will face entry of default. Plaintiff is directed to promptly serve this order on defendant and file a certificate of service. If defendant does not respond by the deadline above, then by 2/23/2026, plaintiff should file a status report noting the lack of response. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 45 |
02/12/2026
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received Plaintiff's Status Report [41]. Plaintiff (and any appearing parties) should file an updated status report by 3/11/2026. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 44 |
02/11/2026
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for entry of default as to Defendant TICTICMISS Fashion 翻译 |
| 43 |
02/10/2026
|
STATUS Report in compliance with Docket No. 33 by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited 翻译 |
| 42 |
01/20/2026
|
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited as to TICTICMISS Fashion on 1/20/2026, answer due 2/10/2026. 翻译 |
| 41 |
01/20/2026
|
SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant TICTICMISS Fashion 翻译 |
| 40 |
01/16/2026
|
SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) TICTICMISS Fashion by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited 翻译 |
| 39 |
01/15/2026
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion [36] for electronic service of process is granted. While a preferable means of service, the court is cognizant of the fact that physical service is not always possible. In this case, Plaintiff certifies that it has attempted, but has been unable, to serve process. In such a circumstance, a less preferable form of service is permissible. Service via email is "reasonably calculated" to be received by defendant, and it is thus adequate in this case. Mullane v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Tr. Co., 339 U.S 306, 319 (1950). What's more, service via email is not barred under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Thus, plaintiff may serve process via email. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 38 |
01/13/2026
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for service by publication, Electronic Service RENEWED 翻译 |
| 37 |
12/31/2025
|
ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/31/2025: Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 36 |
12/11/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu 翻译 |
| 35 |
12/11/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff (and any appearing parties) should file an updated status report by 2/11/2026. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 34 |
12/09/2025
|
STATUS Report in compliance with Docket No. 31 by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited 翻译 |
| 33 |
11/13/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff is directed to file a status report by 12/12/2025 updating the court on the status of the case. 翻译 |
| 32 |
11/13/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's renewed motion for service by email and electronic publication [27] is denied. Plaintiff must first attempt means of service "by any internationally agreed means. that is reasonably calculated to give notice." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(1); see also Mullane v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Tr. Co., 339 U.S. 306, 317 (1950). If there is no internationally agreed means, Plaintiff shall attempt service by the means specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(2). If those means fail, Plaintiff may inform the court and petition this court again for permission to serve process via "other means not prohibited by international agreement." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3). Plaintiff's prior motion for electronic service, [19], is denied as moot. 翻译 |
| 31 |
11/13/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to conduct expedited discovery, [27], is granted subject to the following limitations. Upon Plaintiff's request, any third party with actual notice of this Order who is providing services for the Defendant, or in connection with the Defendant Internet Store, including, without limitation, any online marketplace platforms such as Amazon, (the "Third Party Providers"), shall, within seven (7) calendar days after receipt of such notice, provide to Plaintiff expedited discovery, limited to copies of documents and records in such person's or entity's possession or control sufficient to determine: the identities and locations of Defendant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and any persons acting in active concert or participation with them, including all known contact information and all associated e-mail addresses. 翻译 |
| 30 |
11/13/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to exceed page limitation, [20], is granted. Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, [21], is denied. Ex parte relief is extraordinary. Plaintiff has not identified circumstances warranting such extraordinary relief. See generally Eicher Motors Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 25-CV-02937, 2025 WL 2299593 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2025). 翻译 |
| 29 |
09/08/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for service by publication RENEWED MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF PROCESS PURSUANT TO FRCP 4(f)(3) AND EXPEDITED DISCOVERY FRCP 45 翻译 |
| 28 |
09/08/2025
|
SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant TICTICMISS Fashion 翻译 |
| 27 |
09/08/2025
|
SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) TICTICMISS Fashion by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited 翻译 |
| 26 |
09/08/2025
|
AMENDED complaint by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited against TICTICMISS Fashion and terminating The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A 翻译 |
| 25 |
09/02/2025
|
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited as to Defendant JZGPF (Defendant No. 1) 翻译 |
| 24 |
09/02/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 9/10/2025, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why the defendants in the Schedule A should not be severed for improper joinder. Plaintiff is advised of the following: First, "[o]n motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party." Fed. R. Civ. P. 21(a). Second, sua sponte review of the propriety of joinder in Schedule A cases is a regular practice of courts in this district because plaintiffs "routinely file these multi-defendant cases. using cookie-cutter complaints that allege in a conclusory manner that 'on information and belief' each infringing defendant is inter-connected with the others." Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 24-cv-1566, 2024 WL 2953105, at *1 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Third, "[c]ourts generally find that claims against different defendants arose out of the same transaction or occurrence only if there is a logical relationship between the separate causes of action." Estee Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). Fourth, courts have held that "to be part of the same transaction requires shared, overlapping facts that give rise to each cause of action, and not just distinct, albeit coincidentally identical, facts." Id. (quoting In re EMC Corp., 677 F.3d 1351, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2012)). Fifth, courts have held that the allegation that multiple defendants have infringed on the same copyright or trademark in the same way "does not create the substantial evidentiary overlap required to find a similar transaction or occurrence." Roadget Bus. Pte. Ltd. v. Schedule A Defs., No. 23-cv-17036, 2024 WL 1858592, at *6 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 29, 2024) (collecting cases). Finally, courts have held that the allegation that defendants "share unique identifiers, such as design elements and similarities of the unauthorized products offered for sale," is not sufficient to establish joinder. Ilustrata Servicos Design, Ltda. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 21-cv-05993, 2021 WL 5396690, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 18, 2021); Art Ask Agency v. Individuals, Corps., Ltd. Liab. Cos., P'ships, & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 21-cv-06197, 2021 WL 5493226, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 23, 2021). In the alternative, plaintiff may discharge the order by filing an amended complaint with only one defendant, or with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining why that smaller subset of defendants is properly joined. 翻译 |
| 23 |
07/08/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for temporary restraining order and Expedited Discovery 翻译 |
| 22 |
07/07/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for leave to file excess pages IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 翻译 |
| 21 |
07/07/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for service by publication FOR ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF PROCESS 翻译 |
| 20 |
07/07/2025
|
EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited PUBLIC amended exhibits regarding complaint, 1 翻译 |
| 19 |
07/02/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal, 4, is denied. Plaintiff seeks leave to file under seal so that plaintiff may obtain a temporary restraining order freezing the defendants' assets before revealing the defendants' identities. Id. at 2-6. "The Supreme Court has made clear that courts lack the power to issue an asset freeze at the beginning of a case, unless that party is seeking equitable monetary relief." Zorro Productions, Inc. v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, No. 23-cv-5761, 2023 WL 8807254, at *4 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 20, 2023) (citing Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. All. Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 (1999)); see also Shenzhen Yihong Lighting Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 23-cv-1560, at Dkt. 15 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 22, 2023). Indeed, "[a]s a general matter [ ] prejudgment asset restraints are not proper simply to establish a fund from which a later award of money damages can be satisfied." Zorro, 2023 WL 8807254, at *4 (second alteration in original) (quoting Banister v. Firestone, No. 17-cv-8940, 2018 WL 4224444, at *9 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 5, 2018)). In Schedule A cases, plaintiffs often initially demand equitable relief in the form of an accounting of profits, but after obtaining a temporary asset freeze, plaintiffs uniformly shift their focus to demanding statutory damages. Id. at *3-4. In substance, then, if not in form, Schedule A plaintiffs seek prejudgment asset restraints to establish a fund from which money damages may be awarded. So, despite the demand in plaintiff's complaint that it be awarded defendants' profits, the court is not persuaded that plaintiff will actually seek or obtain such equitable relief (as opposed to statutory damages) in this case. See id. Thus, even if plaintiff's initial demand for an accounting of profits could provide this court with the power to issue a prejudgment asset freeze, see Grupo Mexicano, 527 U.S. at 333; Banister, 2018 WL 4224444, at *9, the court is not persuaded that such a freeze is warranted. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal, 8, is therefore denied. Plaintiff's sealed exhibits, 2, 5, are stricken. If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, plaintiff must file its exhibits publicly on the docket by 7/9/2025. 翻译 |
| 18 |
06/30/2025
|
MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC 翻译 |
| 17 |
06/30/2025
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. 翻译 |
| 16 |
06/30/2025
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). 翻译 |
| 15 |
06/27/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn 翻译 |
| 14 |
06/27/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joseph Wendell Droter 翻译 |
| 13 |
06/27/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu 翻译 |
| 12 |
06/27/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Gokalp Bayramoglu 翻译 |
| 11 |
06/27/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joshua Howard Sheskin 翻译 |
| 10 |
06/27/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joshua Howard Sheskin for Gokalp Bayramoglu 翻译 |
| 9 |
06/27/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joshua Howard Sheskin for Katherine Kuhn 翻译 |
| 8 |
06/27/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joshua Howard Sheskin for Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu 翻译 |
| 7 |
06/27/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joshua Howard Sheskin for Joseph W. Droter 翻译 |
| 6 |
06/27/2025
|
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited 翻译 |
| 5 |
06/27/2025
|
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT 翻译 |
| 4 |
06/27/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited to seal PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL 翻译 |
| 3 |
06/27/2025
|
CIVIL Cover Sheet 翻译 |
| 2 |
06/27/2025
|
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited UNREDACTED COMPLAINT AND EXHIBITS 翻译 |
| 1 |
06/27/2025
|
COMPLAINT filed by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23684181. 翻译 |