2025-cv-05134 +组团 近期案件➥ 订阅
原告律所：keith
品牌：Mark Marko 蘑菇版权
小提示：专注TRO和解/应诉，需要起诉文件/被告名单/其他帮助可联系我们，微信右上角“···”可全文翻译/分享找队友/订阅可自动推送此案最新进展
微信扫码联系我们
| # | Date | Description |
| 30 |
06/26/2025
|
MAILED copyright report with order dated 6/25/2025 to Registrar, Washington DC 翻译 |
| 29 |
06/25/2025
|
DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 6/25/2025. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 28 |
06/25/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: No remaining Defendant has responded to Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion 27 is granted. Based on the evidence previously submitted by Plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, Plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The Clerk is directed to return the surety bond posted. Enter Final Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 27 |
06/16/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Mark Marko for default judgment as to the Defendants Identified in Amended Schedule A 翻译 |
| 26 |
06/11/2025
|
STATUS Report Pursuant to minute entry order 24 by Mark Marko 翻译 |
| 25 |
06/04/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: In light of the amended complaint, a status report as to next steps is due by June 11, 2025. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 24 |
06/03/2025
|
Amended Schedule A to Complaint 1 and Schedule A 2 by Mark Marko 翻译 |
| 23 |
06/03/2025
|
AMENDED complaint by Mark Marko against Hangzhou Niurui Materials 翻译 |
| 22 |
05/27/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The Court has reviewed the plaintiff's memorandum on joinder [Dkt. 20] and determines, within its discretion, that Plaintiff has failed to satisfy its burden to show that joinder of nearly 100 defendants is proper in this matter under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2). See Este Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. The Partnerships, 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (noting that "[plaintiff] bears the burden of demonstrating that joinder is proper"). In evaluating the appropriateness of joinder, the Court assesses whether a logical relationship exists between defendants through actual evidentiary overlap, not coincidence. Este Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 185. Here, Plaintiff argues that coordinated infringement creates a collective harm and joinder is necessary to combat mass harm [Dkt. 20]. But overall, the arguments fall short of establishing a logical relationship among the defendants. At bottom, Plaintiff simply asserts that all of them participated in the same mass infringement on the same ceramic mushroom products. Tang v. Sch. A Defs., 2024 WL 68332, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 4, 2024) (rejecting similar arguments). The Court is not persuaded that any one defendant's infringement is linked to the next defendant's infringement sufficient to show they are part of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences as required by Rule 20. Even if the Court were mistaken in its joinder analysis, the Court exercises its discretion to not permit joinder in this case. See Dorsey v. Varga, 55 F.4th 1094, 110204 (7th Cir. 2022). Joining this many defendants in one case simply will not promote judicial economy. See Este Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189 ("[P]resenting dozens or hundreds of defendants in one lawsuit actually undermines judicial economy, because this Court must evaluate the evidence submitted in support of liability and, eventually, damages. That is especially true in the ex parte setting of a temporary restraining order, as well as for default-judgment motions."); Art Ask Agency, 2021 WL 5493226, at *3 (rejecting joinder of 216 defendants, noting that "joinder in this case may yield significant financial benefits to [the plaintiff] at the judiciary's expense.") Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint consistent with this order along with an amended Schedule A by no later than June 3, 2025. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 21 |
05/23/2025
|
MEMORANDUM text entry, 12 by Mark Marko Supplemental Memorandum in Response to Minute Order 12 翻译 |
| 20 |
05/22/2025
|
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mark Marko as to Hangzhou Niurui Materials, et al. on 5/22/2025, answer due 6/12/2025. 翻译 |
| 19 |
05/22/2025
|
NEW PARTIES: Hangzhou Niurui Materials, et al. added to case caption. 翻译 |
| 18 |
05/15/2025
|
SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant Hangzhou Niurui Materials 翻译 |
| 17 |
05/15/2025
|
ORDER Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 5/15/2025. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 16 |
05/15/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion for expedited discovery and electronic service 13 are granted. Separate order to issue. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 15 |
05/14/2025
|
MEMORANDUM in Support of 13 Exparte Motion 翻译 |
| 14 |
05/12/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins:The Court sua sponte raises the propriety of joining more than 100 defendants in a single action. By May 23, 2025, plaintiff must file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by May 23, 2025 with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining why that smaller subset of defendants is properly joined. No motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order should be filed in this matter without counsel first consulting the opinion issued in Wham-O Holding v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12523, Dkt. 39 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2025) (Alexakis, J.). Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 13 |
05/09/2025
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. 翻译 |
| 12 |
05/09/2025
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel P. McLaughlin. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). 翻译 |
| 11 |
05/09/2025
|
MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC 翻译 |
| 10 |
05/08/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mark Marko by Yi Bu 翻译 |
| 9 |
05/08/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mark Marko by Yanling Jiang 翻译 |
| 8 |
05/08/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mark Marko by Monica Rita Martin 翻译 |
| 7 |
05/08/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mark Marko by Christopher Romero 翻译 |
| 6 |
05/08/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mark Marko by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre 翻译 |
| 5 |
05/08/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mark Marko by Adam Grodman 翻译 |
| 4 |
05/08/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mark Marko by Keith A. Vogt 翻译 |
| 3 |
05/08/2025
|
CIVIL Cover Sheet 翻译 |
| 2 |
05/08/2025
|
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Mark Marko Schedule A to Complaint 1 翻译 |
| 1 |
05/08/2025
|
COMPLAINT filed by Mark Marko; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23462404. 翻译 |