2025-cv-00414 +组团 近期案件➥ 订阅
原告律所：GBC
品牌：Nike 耐克
小提示：专注TRO和解/应诉，需要起诉文件/被告名单/其他帮助可联系我们，微信右上角“···”可全文翻译/分享找队友/订阅可自动推送此案最新进展
微信扫码联系我们
| # | Date | Description |
| 26 |
03/27/2025
|
MAILED trademark report with order dated 3/27/2025 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA 翻译 |
| 25 |
03/27/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff has filed a "Notice of Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)" 22. Because the Notice of Dismissal was filed before the opposing parties served either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, the case is dismissed without prejudice consistent with the terms of the Notice and by operation of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Nelson v. Napolitano, 657 F.3d 586, 587 (7th Cir. 2011) (Rule 41(a)(1)(A) notice of dismissal "is self-executing and effective without further action from the court"). Each party is to bear its own fees and costs. All pending motions are dismissed as moot except for the motion to seal 3, which is granted. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 24 |
03/26/2025
|
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nike, Inc. 翻译 |
| 23 |
03/25/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: On the Court's initiative, all pending motions are held in abeyance, and the case is stayed pending further order. This stay, which the Court is entering in other so-called "Schedule A" cases on its docket where requests for temporary restraining orders remain pending, is intended to permit the Court the opportunity to reassess its previous approach in Schedule A litigation involving Lanham Act, Copyright Act, and Patent Act claims typically brought on an ex parte basis against various online merchants. This reassessment will consider, among other things, whether: (1) ex parte proceedings are appropriate in these types of cases; (2) the routine sealing of parts or all of the docket is appropriate; (3) the routine granting of temporary restraining orders on an ex parte basis is a sound exercise of judicial discretion; (4) the routine granting of prejudgment asset restraints is a sound exercise of judicial discretion; and (5) the mass joinder of defendants is appropriate under the circumstances typically present in Schedule A cases. Plaintiff remains free, of course, to dismiss this action voluntarily if they wish to pursue their claims in another District, but no supplemental briefing on the pending motions may be filed absent advance leave of Court. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 22 |
01/15/2025
|
DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 19 翻译 |
| 21 |
01/15/2025
|
MEMORANDUM by Nike, Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 18 翻译 |
| 20 |
01/15/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) 翻译 |
| 19 |
01/15/2025
|
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. Exhibit 2 - Parts 1-2 regarding declaration 16 翻译 |
| 18 |
01/15/2025
|
DECLARATION of Joe Pallett regarding memorandum in support of motion 14 翻译 |
| 17 |
01/15/2025
|
DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 14 翻译 |
| 16 |
01/15/2025
|
MEMORANDUM by Nike, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order 13 翻译 |
| 15 |
01/15/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery 翻译 |
| 14 |
01/14/2025
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. 翻译 |
| 13 |
01/14/2025
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). 翻译 |
| 12 |
01/14/2025
|
MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials 翻译 |
| 11 |
01/14/2025
|
MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA 翻译 |
| 10 |
01/14/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nike, Inc. by Berel Yonathan Lakovitsky 翻译 |
| 9 |
01/14/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nike, Inc. by Marcella Deshonda Slay 翻译 |
| 8 |
01/14/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nike, Inc. by Amy Crout Ziegler 翻译 |
| 7 |
01/14/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nike, Inc. by Justin R. Gaudio 翻译 |
| 6 |
01/14/2025
|
Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Nike, Inc. 翻译 |
| 5 |
01/14/2025
|
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Nike, Inc. 翻译 |
| 4 |
01/14/2025
|
CIVIL Cover Sheet 翻译 |
| 3 |
01/14/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. for leave to file under seal 翻译 |
| 2 |
01/14/2025
|
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint[1] 翻译 |
| 1 |
01/14/2025
|
COMPLAINT filed by Nike, Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22951029. 翻译 |