2025-cv-00325 +组团 近期案件➥ 订阅
原告律所：Getech Law LLC
品牌：蝴蝶版权
小提示：专注TRO和解/应诉，需要起诉文件/被告名单/其他帮助可联系我们，微信右上角“···”可全文翻译/分享找队友/订阅可自动推送此案最新进展
微信扫码联系我们
| # | Date | Description |
| 63 |
01/28/2026
|
ORDER: Signed by the Honorable Heather K. McShain on 1/28/2026. Emailed notice 翻译 |
| 62 |
01/28/2026
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Heather K. McShain: In accordance with Rule 37(a)(5)(A), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Order the Court finds that defendants' conduct which led to plaintiff's motion to compel discovery, 112, was not substantially justified and that no circumstances make an award of expenses unjust. Accordingly, the plaintiff's petition for reasonable attorney's fees, 124, is granted in part and plaintiff is awarded $9,250 in attorney's fees. Further, after reviewing defendants' opposition, the Court has concerns that it was drafted using generative AI and not properly reviewed before filing. An instructive example can be found in defendant's use of the case Chicago Reg'l Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. Celtic Floor Covering, Inc., 316 F. Supp. 3d 1044 (N.D. Ill. 2018). Defendant uses this citation for the proposition that a court can reduce the number of hours a petitioner claims to have worked "for a simple motion to compel[.]" 125 5. However, the cited case does not concern a fee petition or motion to compel and never discusses the appropriate number of hours worked by attorneys on a motion. Rather, it is an order denying a motion to quash for failure to comply with L.R. 37.2. Further, the page cited for this proposition, 1052, does not exist. The case ends on page 1047. Even more concerning, defendant later quotes two sentences, purportedly from this case. 125 5. While the first sentence can be found in the cited opinion, the second sentence cannot. Chicago Reg'l Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, 316 F. Supp. 3d at 1047. For these reasons, the Court finds there is good cause to enter the following order: any party in this litigation using generative AI to draft or write any filing, must comply with all relevant Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including Rule 11(b) and any other applicable ethical rule. In addition, each party must include a declaration along with any filing in this case that was written or drafted using generative AI tools. This declaration must certify that the filing party has verified the correctness and accuracy of the factual information and legal citations present in the filing. Failure to do so may result in the filing being stricken. Enter Order. All matters related to the referral completed, the referral is closed. Emailed notice 翻译 |
| 61 |
01/12/2026
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: The 1/13/26 presentment hearing is stricken as moot. The Motion to Dismiss and to Dissolve the Preliminary Injunction is fully briefed. The Court will rule electronically. Notice mailed by Judge's staff 翻译 |
| 60 |
01/04/2026
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Plaintiff's Motion to exceed page limitation [128] is granted. Motion hearing date of 1/6/26 is stricken. Notice mailed by Judge's staff 翻译 |
| 59 |
01/02/2026
|
NOTICE of Motion by Jianyin Liu for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, motion for miscellaneous relief, motion to dismiss, [127] before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 1/13/2026 at 09:30 AM. 翻译 |
| 58 |
01/02/2026
|
REPLY by https://www.pandahall.com/, https://www.pandawhole.com/ to response in opposition to motion, [130] 翻译 |
| 57 |
12/31/2025
|
ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/31/2025: Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 56 |
12/31/2025
|
STIPULATION of Dismissal 翻译 |
| 55 |
12/23/2025
|
RESPONSE by Wenjie Xiein Opposition to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants https://www.pandawhole.com/, https://www.pandahall.com/ Presented before District Judge MOTION by Defendants https://www.pandawhole.com/, https://www.pandahall.com/to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction [DE 30] Presented before District Judge MOTION by Defendants https://www.pandawhole.com/, https://www.pandahall.com/ to dismiss for lack of standing Presented before District Judge [127] 翻译 |
| 54 |
12/23/2025
|
NOTICE of Motion by Ge Lei for presentment of motion for leave to file[128] before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 1/6/2026 at 09:30 AM. 翻译 |
| 53 |
12/23/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Wenjie Xie for leave to file excess pages Presented before District Judge 翻译 |
| 52 |
11/20/2025
|
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants https://www.pandawhole.com/, https://www.pandahall.com/ Presented before District Judge, MOTION by Defendants https://www.pandawhole.com/, https://www.pandahall.com/to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction [DE 30] Presented before District Judge, MOTION by Defendants https://www.pandawhole.com/, https://www.pandahall.com/ to dismiss for lack of standing Presented before District Judge 翻译 |
| 51 |
11/18/2025
|
STATUS Report Filed Jointly with Plaintiff Pursuant to Order [DE 101] by https://www.pandahall.com/, https://www.pandawhole.com/ Presented before District Judge 翻译 |
| 50 |
09/23/2025
|
RESPONSE by Defendants https://www.pandahall.com/, https://www.pandawhole.com/ to petition[124] 翻译 |
| 49 |
09/19/2025
|
PETITION order on motion to compel, motion hearing, [123] 翻译 |
| 48 |
09/16/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Heather K. McShain: Telephonic motion hearing held 09/16/2025. For the reasons stated on the record, plaintiff's motion to compel [112] is granted. The Court also grants plaintiff's request for reasonable attorney's fees and costs associated with the motion to compel pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(A). Plaintiff is to file a fee petition by 09/19/2025. Defendants Pandahall and Pandawhole's response due 10/03/2025. No reply to be filed. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 47 |
09/16/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Wenjie Xie by Michael Boldt 翻译 |
| 46 |
09/11/2025
|
SATISFACTION of Judgment 翻译 |
| 45 |
09/10/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Heather K. McShain: Due to a scheduling conflict for defense counsel for defendants https://www.pandahall.com/, https://www.pandawhole.com/, communicated via e-mail to Chambers on 09/10/2025, telephonic motion hearing set for 09/15/2025 is reset to 09/16/2025 at 9:30 a.m. Dial-in information [119] remains the same. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 44 |
09/08/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Heather K. McShain: Telephonic motion hearing set for 09/15/2025 at 9:00 a.m. on plaintiff's motion to compel [112]. To participate in the telephonic hearing, the dial-in number is 650-479-3207, followed by access code 1808 98 4405#. Press # to bypass the Attendee ID number. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 43 |
09/05/2025
|
NOTICE by https://www.pandahall.com/, https://www.pandawhole.com/ re text entry, [117] 翻译 |
| 42 |
09/05/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Heather K. McShain: The Court observes that Exhibit A [116-2] attached to defendants' response [116] to plaintiff's motion to compel [112] contains sensitive customer information. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to place the filing at Docket Number 116-2 under seal. Defendants https://www.pandahall.com/ and https://www.pandawhole.com/ must file a corresponding redacted version of the exhibit by 09/09/2025. See Local Rule 26.2. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 41 |
08/30/2025
|
RESPONSE by https://www.pandahall.com/, https://www.pandawhole.com/in Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Wenjie Xie to compel Presented before District Judge [112] 翻译 |
| 40 |
08/26/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Heather K. McShain: Plaintiff's motion to compel [112] directed to Defendant https://www.pandahall.com/ ("Pandahall") and Defendant https://www.pandawhole.com/ ("Pandawhole") has been referred to Magistrate Judge McShain [114]. Plaintiff's motion and attached declaration indicate that the parties' last meet and confer held via videoconference was 05/05/2025. Since then, the parties have only engaged in email correspondence. Yet plaintiff's motion indicates that defendants have "produced minimal, deficient supplements" on several occasions since the 05/05/2025 conferral and plaintiff has continued to notify defendants that the productions are deficient. [112] 4, 5. As the Court has informed the parties [92], Judge McShain's standing order on discovery motions requires parties to make good faith attempts to resolve differences in person or via videoconference before bringing a discovery dispute before the Court, and the mere exchange of correspondence is not sufficient to comply with the parties' obligations under Local Rule 37.2. Plaintiff's declaration states that the requirement to meet in-person regarding the discovery disputes is impracticable because plaintiff's counsel is based in Chicago, IL, and defendants' counsel is based in Palmetto Bay, FL. However, the "in-person" requirement is satisfied by videoconferencing, which the parties have been able to do. Regardless, based on a review of the materials submitted by plaintiff, the Court questions whether any additional meet and confer would be productive and whether defendants are willing to confer in good faith. Plaintiff represents that following the 05/05/2025 meet and confer, plaintiff issued a third deficiency letter on 06/06/2025 to Defendant Pandahall and to Defendant Pandawhole and that neither defendant acknowledged plaintiff's request for another meet and confer. Plaintiff states that when she has contacted defendants via email multiple times about outstanding production deficiencies, defendants have indicated that plaintiff should file a motion to compel if she needs further information, "indicating Defendants have concluded their participation." [112-1] 3. See [112-7] 2, 3, 7 (emails from defense attorney directing plaintiff's attorneys to file a motion to compel). Plaintiff also represents that defense counsel has been "extremely difficult to work with" and that conducting further meet and confers will be burdensome and impracticable based on defense counsel's behavior. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to compel [112] is entered and continued. Defendants' response due 09/03/2025. No reply to be filed without leave of the Court. Once the Court has reviewed the briefs, it will decide whether it can rule on the papers or whether a motion hearing is required. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 39 |
08/25/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery [112] is referred to the Magistrate Judge. Motion hearing set for 8/26/25 is stricken. Notice mailed by Judge's staff 翻译 |
| 38 |
08/20/2025
|
NOTICE of Motion by Ge Lei for presentment of motion to compel[112] before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 8/26/2025 at 09:30 AM. 翻译 |
| 37 |
08/20/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Wenjie Xie to compel Presented before District Judge 翻译 |
| 36 |
07/14/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: The Court is in receipt of Defendant Uideyvi's consolidated motion to vacate the default judgment and to dismiss on the grounds of a lack of personal jurisdiction. Because the issues raised are similar to those previously raised by other Defendants the Court denies the motion [110] without prejudice to refiling a consolidated motion with the other Defendants raising similar arguments after the conclusion of jurisdictional discovery following the process laid out in ECF No. 101. Motion hearing set for 7/15/25 is stricken. Notice mailed by Judge's staff 翻译 |
| 35 |
07/02/2025
|
MOTION by Defendant Uideyvi to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Presented before District Judge 翻译 |
| 34 |
07/02/2025
|
NOTICE of Motion by Ruixin Lu for presentment of before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 7/15/2025 at 09:30 AM. 翻译 |
| 33 |
06/27/2025
|
NOTICE of Correction regarding MOTION [107]. 翻译 |
| 32 |
06/20/2025
|
MOTION by Defendant Uideyvi to vacate Default Judgement and Dismiss Presented before District Judge 翻译 |
| 31 |
05/28/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: On its own motion, the Court strikes Defendants' motion to dismiss and to dissolve the preliminary injunction [104] as premature. Prior to filing any similar motion, the Defendants must comply with the process provided in the Court's 5/7/25 order [101]. Notice mailed by Judge's staff 翻译 |
| 30 |
05/21/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Uideyvi by Ruixin Lu 翻译 |
| 29 |
05/19/2025
|
MOTION by Defendants https://estarcase.com/, https://www.pandawhole.com/, https://www.pandahall.com/, Yueguang Xia to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Presented before District Judge, MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants https://estarcase.com/, https://www.pandawhole.com/, https://www.pandahall.com/, Yueguang Xia Presented before District Judge, MOTION by Defendants https://estarcase.com/, https://www.pandawhole.com/, https://www.pandahall.com/, Yueguang Xiato Dissolve Preliminary Injunction Presented before District Judge 翻译 |
| 28 |
05/08/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Plaintiff's motion to stay [99] is denied as moot in light of the Court's subsequent order vacating the briefing schedule [101]. Motion hearing set for 5/14/25 is stricken. Notice mailed by Judge's staff 翻译 |
| 27 |
05/08/2025
|
SATISFACTION of Judgment 翻译 |
| 26 |
05/07/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Telephonic Motion hearing held. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court denies Defendant nekonozakka's [70] motion to dismiss as moot in light of the stipulation of dismissal [96] and denies Defendants' motion to stay expedited discovery [91]. In addition, the three remaining Defendants, represented by the same counsel, have filed six motions asking the Court to dissolve the preliminary injunction and to dismiss the complaint. After filing these motions, two of the Defendants requested an evidentiary hearing raising new arguments supporting these motions, including on the basis of a lack of standing. The other remaining Defendant advanced materially similar arguments in the motion to stay. At this point, Defendants arguments supporting their motions are unclear and disjointed. As such, the most prudent path forward in resolving these interrelated motions would be for the Defendants to file a consolidated motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction and to dismiss the complaint raising all arguments in one motion, including any request for an evidentiary hearing, after expedited discovery has concluded. Accordingly, the Court denies the pending motions without prejudice [33] [37] [43] [46] [59] [69] [88] and vacates all related pending briefing schedules. Within seven days of expedited discovery concluding, the parties shall file a joint status report containing a proposed briefing schedule on Defendants' consolidated motion, including their positions on whether the jurisdictional discovery requested by Defendants is necessary before Defendants' motion is filed. Notice mailed by Judge's staff 翻译 |
| 25 |
05/07/2025
|
NOTICE of Motion by Ge Lei for presentment of motion to stay[99] before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 5/14/2025 at 09:30 AM. 翻译 |
| 24 |
05/07/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Wenjie Xie to stay Presented before District Judge 翻译 |
| 23 |
05/07/2025
|
REPLY by https://www.pandahall.com/, https://www.pandawhole.com/ to MOTION by Defendants https://www.pandahall.com/, https://www.pandawhole.com/ for hearing re MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant https://www.pandawhole.com/ MOTION by Defendant https://www.pandawhole.com/ to dism[88] 翻译 |
| 22 |
05/06/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Telephonic motion hearing set for 5/6/25 at 9:30 a.m. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is 650-479-3207 and the access code is 1804010308. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Notice mailed by Judge's staff 翻译 |
| 21 |
05/06/2025
|
STIPULATION of Dismissal 翻译 |
| 20 |
05/05/2025
|
NOTICE of Motion by Jianyin Liu for presentment of motion to stay[91] before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 5/7/2025 at 09:30 AM. 翻译 |
| 19 |
04/29/2025
|
RESPONSE by Wenjie Xiein Opposition to MOTION by Defendants https://www.pandahall.com/, https://www.pandawhole.com/ for hearing re MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant https://www.pandawhole.com/ MOTION by Defendant https://www.pandawhole.com/ to dism[88] 翻译 |
| 18 |
04/27/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant HANYIJIAJU by Ni Xue 翻译 |
| 17 |
04/25/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Heather K. McShain: Plaintiff's motion to compel [84] has been referred to Magistrate Judge McShain [86, 87]. Plaintiff requests that the Court compel defendants to provide full responses to plaintiff's First Sets of Requests for Admission and First Set of Interrogatories and to produce documents responsive to plaintiff's First Set of Requests for Production. Plaintiff argues that defendants have continuously delayed and failed to produce any relevant written responses or documents, providing only blanket objections and denials. However, this is all the argument that plaintiff's motion provides. Instead, plaintiff relies on arguments made in its deficiency letters to defendants, which plaintiff attaches as exhibits. [84-3, 84-4]. The motion does not identify exactly which requests are at issue and whether any have been resolved by defendants' supplemental responses, nor does plaintiff provide a copy of defendants' responses to plaintiff's requests for the Court to assess. Although defendants were aware of their responses such that references in the deficiency letters alerted them to disputed issues, the Court is not and the deficiency letters alone are insufficient. "The party requesting discovery bears the initial burden to establish its relevancy." Mendez v. City of Chicago, 2020 WL 4736399, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 14, 2020). See also Hollis v. CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc., 603 F.Supp.3d 611, 620 (N.D. Ill. 2022). Plaintiff's motion itself merely states that "the information sought is rudimentary in nature and narrowly tailored." And it is not the role of the Court to deduce the requests at issue nor plaintiff's arguments as to each dispute from exhibits. Additionally, the parties have not sufficiently exhausted their meet and confer obligations. The parties are directed to review Magistrate Judge McShain's requirements for discovery motions (available on the Court's website by selecting the link for Magistrate Judge McShain and then the link for "Discovery Motion Requirements") in advance of the filing of any discovery motion. Judge McShain's standing order requires parties to make good faith attempts to resolve differences in person or via videoconference before bringing a discovery dispute before the Court, and states that a movant's "Rule 37.2 Certificate must state that this requirement has been met or why it cannot be met with particularity." The mere exchange of correspondence is not sufficient to comply with the parties' meet and confer obligations under Local Rule 37.2, and Judge McShain's standing order requires face to face communications, not mere telephone calls, regarding discovery disputes unless it is impracticable to do so. The standing order also warns of the Court's strict enforcement of Local Rule 37.2 and that parties who fail to indicate that they have met in person/via videoconference risk having their motion stricken. Plaintiff's motion explains that plaintiff and Defendants Yueguang Xia and https://www.pandahall.com/ conferred via Zoom on 03/25/2025. These defendants then issued supplemental responses. These parties and Defendant https://www.pandawhole.com/ conferred on 04/10/2025 via telephone, not in-person or via videoconference. Furthermore, plaintiff reports that Defendant Yueguang Xia issued a second supplemental response on 04/21/2025. Plaintiff filed the instant motion to compel on 04/21/2025 [84]. Plaintiff and Defendant Yueguang Xia therefore did not meet and confer after the latest supplemental responses were produced. For these reasons, plaintiff's motion to compel [84] is denied without prejudice. Mailed notice 翻译 |
| 16 |
04/24/2025
|
MOTION by Defendants Yueguang Xia, https://www.pandahall.com/, https://www.pandawhole.com/ to stay expedited discovery Presented before District Judge 翻译 |
| 15 |
04/24/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Telephonic status hearing held and continued to 5/28/25 at 9:30 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint status report 3 days in advance of the next hearing. Plaintiff's response to Defendants https://www.pandahall.com/ and https://www.pandawhole.com/'s Expedited Motion for evidentiary hearing, alternatively expedited limited jurisdiction discovery [88] shall be filed by 5/1/25; Defendants' reply shall be filed by 5/8/25. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is 650-479-3207 and the access code is 1804010308. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Notice mailed by Judge's staff 翻译 |
| 14 |
04/23/2025
|
NOTICE of Motion by Jianyin Liu for presentment of motion for hearing, [88] before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 4/29/2025 at 09:30 AM. 翻译 |
| 13 |
04/23/2025
|
MOTION by Defendants https://www.pandahall.com/, https://www.pandawhole.com/ for hearing re MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant https://www.pandawhole.com/ MOTION by Defendant https://www.pandawhole.com/ to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction [69], MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant https://www.pandahall.com/ MOTION by Defendant https://www.pandahall.com/ to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction [46] for Evidentiary Hearing Presented before District Judge 翻译 |
| 12 |
04/22/2025
|
Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Heather K. McShain for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery motion; Plaintiff's motion to compel [84].Notice mailed by Judge's staff. 翻译 |
| 11 |
04/22/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: The Court keeps on calendar the status conference scheduled for 4/24/25 and expects counsel for the parties to appear telephonically. The Court issues the following rulings to streamline the hearing. Defendants hongculier-US, Chuxvif-US, Oumij1, Vijayli us motion to dismiss [36] is denied as moot in light of the voluntary dismissal of these parties [74]. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction [22] which is pending only as to hongculier-US, Chuxvif-US, Oumij1, Vijayli us is denied as moot as to these Defendants for the same reason. The Court sets the following briefing schedule for https://www.pandawhole.com/'s motion to dismiss [69]: Plaintiff's response shall be filed by May 8, 2025 and Defendant's reply shall be filed by May 22, 2025. Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery [84] is referred to the Magistrate Judge. Notice mailed by Judge's staff 翻译 |
| 10 |
04/21/2025
|
NOTICE of Motion by Ge Lei for presentment of motion to compel[84] before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 4/24/2025 at 09:30 AM. 翻译 |
| 9 |
04/21/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Wenjie Xie to compel discovery 翻译 |
| 8 |
04/21/2025
|
STATUS Report JOINT by Wenjie Xie 翻译 |
| 7 |
04/21/2025
|
REPLY by https://www.pandawhole.com/ to MOTION by Defendant https://www.pandawhole.com/to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction [DE 30] Against Defendant [59] 翻译 |
| 6 |
04/15/2025
|
REPLY by https://www.pandahall.com/ to MOTION by Defendant https://www.pandahall.com/to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction [DE 30] [43] 翻译 |
| 5 |
04/11/2025
|
SATISFACTION of Judgment 翻译 |
| 4 |
04/09/2025
|
REPLY by Yueguang Xia to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Yueguang Xia [37] 翻译 |
| 3 |
04/08/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Telephonic motion hearing held. Plaintiff's responses to Defendant https://www.pandahall.com/'s Rule 12(b) Motion to dismiss [46] and Defendant Nekonozakka.com's Motion to dismiss [70] shall be filed by 5/12/25; Defendants' replies shall be filed 5/26/25. Notice mailed by Judge's staff 翻译 |
| 2 |
04/08/2025
|
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs 翻译 |
| 1 |
04/08/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Telephonic motion hearing set for 4/8/25 at 9:30 a.m. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is 650-479-3207 and the access code is 1804010308. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Notice mailed by Judge's staff 翻译 |