2024-cv-07399 +组团 近期案件➥ 订阅
原告律所：Getech Law LLC
品牌：LELINTA、YOULOVEIT、 FOCUSSEXY、SAYFUT
小提示：专注TRO和解/应诉，需要起诉文件/被告名单/其他帮助可联系我们，微信右上角“···”可全文翻译/分享找队友/订阅可自动推送此案最新进展
微信扫码联系我们
| # | Date | Description |
| 21 |
03/27/2025
|
MAILED Trademark report with certified copy of minute order dated 3/26/2025 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA 翻译 |
| 20 |
03/26/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Pursuant to the Notice of Dismissal under Rule 41(a) [17], this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated. 翻译 |
| 19 |
03/25/2025
|
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Guangzhou Luck Commerce Co. Ltd. 翻译 |
| 18 |
03/25/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 4/1/2025, plaintiff should file a status report updating the court on the status of this case, including the status of service. 翻译 |
| 17 |
01/31/2025
|
AMENDED complaint by Guangzhou Luck Commerce Co. Ltd. against Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations on Schedule A 翻译 |
| 16 |
01/17/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process, [8], is granted. The court finds that electronic service of process is proper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3). Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. To the extent that the motion requests service of process of any temporary restraining order in this case, service is not necessary because this court has already denied the motion for a TRO. [13]. 翻译 |
| 15 |
01/17/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal, [10], and for a temporary restraining order and for expedited discovery, [6], are denied. Plaintiff seeks leave to file under seal so that plaintiff may obtain a temporary restraining order freezing the defendants' assets before revealing the defendants' identities. See [10]. "The Supreme Court has made clear that courts lack the power to issue an asset freeze at the beginning of a case, unless that party is seeking equitable monetary relief." Zorro Productions, Inc. v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, No. 23-cv-5761, 2023 WL 8807254, at *4 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 20, 2023) (citing Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. All. Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 (1999)); see also Shenzhen Yihong Lighting Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 23-cv-1560, at Dkt. 15 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 22, 2023). Indeed, "[a]s a general matter [ ] prejudgment asset restraints are not proper simply to establish a fund from which a later award of money damages can be satisfied." Id. (second alteration in original) (quoting Banister v. Firestone, No. 17-cv-8940, 2018 WL 4224444, at *9 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 5, 2018)). In Schedule A cases, plaintiffs often initially demand equitable relief in the form of an accounting of profits, but after obtaining a temporary asset freeze, plaintiffs uniformly shift their focus to demanding statutory damages. Id. at *3-4. In substance, then, if not in form, Schedule A plaintiffs seek prejudgment asset restraints to establish a fund from which money damages may be awarded. So, despite the demand in plaintiff's complaint that it be awarded defendants' profits, the court is not persuaded that plaintiff will actually seek or obtain such equitable relief-as opposed to statutory damages-in this case. See Zorro, 2023 WL 8807254, at *3-4. Thus, even if plaintiff's initial demand for an accounting of profits could provide this court with the power to issue a prejudgment asset freeze, see Grupo Mexicano, 527 U.S. at 333; Banister, 2018 WL 4224444, at *9, the court is not persuaded that such a freeze is warranted. Because the court denies the motion for a temporary restraining order, there is no reason to seal plaintiff's filings pending such relief. Plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal, [10], and for a temporary restraining order, [6], are therefore denied. Plaintiff's sealed exhibits, [2], [7], [9], are stricken. If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, plaintiff must file its exhibits publicly on the docket by 1/31/2025. 翻译 |
| 14 |
12/27/2024
|
ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/27/2024: Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 13 |
08/19/2024
|
MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA 翻译 |
| 12 |
08/19/2024
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. 翻译 |
| 11 |
08/19/2024
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). 翻译 |
| 10 |
08/19/2024
|
MOTION by Plaintiff GUANGZHOU LUCK COMMERCE CO. LTD. to seal amended document 2, SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff for Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order 6 and 7, and Sealed Motion by Plaintiff for Alternative Service 8 and 9 翻译 |
| 9 |
08/19/2024
|
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff GUANGZHOU LUCK COMMERCE CO. LTD. Memorandum in Support of Motion for Alternative Service 翻译 |
| 8 |
08/19/2024
|
SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff GUANGZHOU LUCK COMMERCE CO. LTD. for alternative service 翻译 |
| 7 |
08/19/2024
|
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff GUANGZHOU LUCK COMMERCE CO. LTD. Memorandum in Support of Motion for TRO 翻译 |
| 6 |
08/19/2024
|
SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff GUANGZHOU LUCK COMMERCE CO. LTD. Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order 翻译 |
| 5 |
08/19/2024
|
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by GUANGZHOU LUCK COMMERCE CO. LTD. 翻译 |
| 4 |
08/16/2024
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff GUANGZHOU LUCK COMMERCE CO. LTD. by Ge Lei 翻译 |
| 3 |
08/16/2024
|
CIVIL Cover Sheet 翻译 |
| 2 |
08/16/2024
|
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff GUANGZHOU LUCK COMMERCE CO. LTD. Amended Complaint 翻译 |
| 1 |
08/16/2024
|
COMPLAINT filed by GUANGZHOU LUCK COMMERCE CO. LTD.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22375375. 翻译 |