2024-cv-06268 +组团 近期案件➥ 订阅
原告律所：Rosenbaum Famularo & Segall, P.C.
品牌：电视墙支架专利
小提示：专注TRO和解/应诉，需要起诉文件/被告名单/其他帮助可联系我们，微信右上角“···”可全文翻译/分享找队友/订阅可自动推送此案最新进展
微信扫码联系我们
| # | Date | Description |
| 39 |
06/26/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: By stipulation 35, this case is dismissed with prejudice under Rule 41(a). Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 38 |
06/18/2025
|
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by JTLE Investments LLC 翻译 |
| 37 |
01/27/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: On 12/18/24, this Court granted Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and entered the requested order. See 20. The order required Plaintiff to post a $10,000 surety bond within seven days, see 20 11. Yet it appears that, to date, Plaintiff has not posted the required bond. Because Plaintiff has failed to comply with the terms of the TRO, the Court denies without prejudice its motion for further injunctive relief 30. The 1/29/25 motion hearing date is stricken. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 36 |
01/24/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the Court's trial schedule, the 1/28/25 motion hearing date is stricken and the hearing on Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction [30] is reset to 1/29/25 at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 35 |
01/21/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the Court's trial schedule, the 1/22/25 motion hearing date is stricken and the hearing on Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 30 is reset to 1/28/25 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 34 |
01/15/2025
|
NOTICE of Motion by Cory Jay Rosenbaum for presentment of motion for preliminary injunction 30 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 1/22/2025 at 11:00 AM. 翻译 |
| 33 |
01/14/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff JTLE Investments LLC for preliminary injunction 翻译 |
| 32 |
01/13/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court denies Plaintiff's second motion to extend the TRO entered 12/18/24 [25]. This Court has already extended the TRO once and Rule 65 does not authorize further extensions. E.g., H-D Michigan, LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 844 (7th Cir. 2012) ("the language of Rule 65(b)(2) and the great weight of authority support the view that 28 days is the outer limit for a TRO without the consent of the enjoined party, regardless of whether the TRO was issued with or without notice."). The 1/15/25 Notice of Motion date is stricken. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 31 |
01/13/2025
|
MEMORANDUM by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto in Opposition to extension of time[25] 翻译 |
| 30 |
01/13/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto by Oliver D. Yang 翻译 |
| 29 |
01/13/2025
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto 翻译 |
| 28 |
01/10/2025
|
NOTICE of Motion by Cory Jay Rosenbaum for presentment of extension of time 25 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 1/15/2025 at 11:00 AM. 翻译 |
| 27 |
01/10/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff JTLE Investments LLC for extension of time to extend the TRO 翻译 |
| 26 |
01/07/2025
|
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by JTLE Investments LLC 翻译 |
| 25 |
01/02/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court grants Plaintiff's ex parte motion 21 to extend the temporary restraining order entered 12/18/24 20. The Court finds that good cause exists to extend the temporary restraining order, and the order is hereby extended an additional fourteen days, to 1/15/25. The Court reminds counsel that all motions must be noticed for presentment. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 24 |
12/27/2024
|
ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/27/2024: Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 23 |
12/30/2024
|
MOTION by Plaintiff JTLE Investments LLC for extension of time to extend the TRO 翻译 |
| 22 |
12/18/2024
|
SEALED ORDER Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 12/18/2024. Mailed notice 翻译 |
| 21 |
12/18/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Having reviewed Plaintiff's proposed TRO, the Court now grants Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order 15 as to Defendant No. 1. Enter Sealed Order. Absent further order, this temporary restraining order will expire 12/31/24. Mailed notice 翻译 |
| 20 |
12/10/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: On 7/30/24, this Court allowed Plaintiff to proceed on its complaint, which sued three Defendants for patent infringement (among other claims). See 10. At that time, the Court took Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order under advisement, id. On 9/23/24, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint, which seeks to add two more Defendants, see 12. As explained, under 35 U.S.C. § 299, "parties that are accused infringers may be joined in one action as defendants. only if-- (1) any right to relief is asserted against the parties jointly, severally, or in the alternative with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences relating to the making, using, importing into the United States, offering for sale, or selling of the same accused product or process; and (2) questions of fact common to all defendants or counterclaim defendants will arise in the action. Id. § 299(a). The statute specifically provides that "accused infringers may not be joined in one action as defendants. based solely on allegations that they each have infringed the patent or patents in suit." Id. § 299(b). Plaintiff alleges that "the Infringing Products for sale in the Defendants Internet Stores are nearly identical, or (at least) bear similarities and indicia of being related to one another, suggesting that the infringing products were manufactured by and come from a common source and that, upon information and belief, the Defendants are interrelated" and that the Defendants' Internet Stores "also include other notable common features, including accepted payment methods, check-out methods, metadata, illegitimate SEO tactics, HTML user-defined variables, domain redirection, lack of contact information, identically or similarly priced items and volume sales discounts, similar hosting services, similar name servers, similar locations, and the use of the same or similar text and images." 12 34-35. But these allegations remain conclusory and unsupported in the record (Plaintiff offers no screenshot evidence or other support to show that the defendants' products are similar to each other or, in the case of Defendants 2 through 5, similar to the patented invention). Plaintiff's submission does support Plaintiff's claim of infringement as to Defendant No. 1, however, and the Court will allow Plaintiff to proceed against this Defendant. The Court grants Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process 16 as to Defendant No. 1 and takes under advisement Plaintiff's motion for entry of a temporary restraining order 15 as to Defendant No. 1; if Plaintiff wants the Court to consider this motion, it must submit a proposed order by 12/12/24. The Court dismisses the case as to the remaining four defendants and strikes the 12/11/24 Notice of Motion date. Mailed notice 翻译 |
| 19 |
12/04/2024
|
NOTICE of Motion by Cory Jay Rosenbaum for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief 16, motion for temporary restraining order 15 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 12/11/2024 at 11:00 AM. 翻译 |
| 18 |
12/04/2024
|
MOTION by Plaintiff JTLE Investments LLCelectronic service 翻译 |
| 17 |
12/04/2024
|
MOTION by Plaintiff JTLE Investments LLC for temporary restraining order and supporting memorandum of law 翻译 |
| 16 |
10/08/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff having filed an amended complaint 12, Plaintiff denies Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order 2, which is based upon the prior complaint. The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to seal 13. The Court reminds counsel that all motions must be noticed for presentment; in the future, the Court will strike any motions not noticed. Mailed notice 翻译 |
| 15 |
09/23/2024
|
MOTION by Plaintiff JTLE Investments LLC to seal Amended complaint and schedule A 翻译 |
| 14 |
09/23/2024
|
AMENDED complaint by JTLE Investments LLC against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto 翻译 |
| 13 |
07/31/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Motion hearing set for 8/7/2024 is stricken. Mailed notice (gel,) 翻译 |
| 12 |
07/30/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: In this case, Plaintiff sues three Defendants alleging infringement of its design patent, among other claims. See [1]. Under 35 U.S.C. § 299, "parties that are accused infringers may be joined in one action as defendants. only if-- (1) any right to relief is asserted against the parties jointly, severally, or in the alternative with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences relating to the making, using, importing into the United States, offering for sale, or selling of the same accused product or process; and (2) questions of fact common to all defendants or counterclaim defendants will arise in the action. Id. § 299(a). The statute specifically provides that "accused infringers may not be joined in one action as defendants. based solely on allegations that they each have infringed the patent or patents in suit." Id. § 299(b). Here, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants' infringing products "share unique identifiers, such as design elements, colors, packaging, and other similarities between the Infringing Products offered for sale, establishing a logical relationship between the Defendants and suggesting that the Defendants' illegal operations arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences." [1] 4. Plaintiff also alleges that Defendants are selling and offering for sale "an identical infringing product under (at least) the "BUSHAD" and "SmokeBar Shop" Brand names," and that "the Infringing Products for sale in the Defendants Internet Stores are nearly identical, or (at least) bear similarities and indicia of being related to one another, suggesting that the infringing products were manufactured by and come from a common source and that, upon information and belief, the Defendants are interrelated." Id. 18, 32. Plaintiff supports such allegations with documentation evidencing the identical nature of the accused products. For present purposes, such allegations, supported with evidence, satisfy §299(a), as well as Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2), and Plaintiff may proceed against the identified Defendants in this single action. Additionally, based upon the materials submitted, this Court grants Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal [4] and motion for leave to serve process electronically [3]. The Court takes Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order [2] under advisement pending Plaintiff's submission of a proposed order, in compliance with this Court's standing order. The 7/31/24 Notice of Motion date is stricken as to all motions. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 11 |
07/30/2024
|
Re- NOTICE of Motion by Cory Jay Rosenbaum for presentment of motion for temporary restraining order[2] before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 8/7/2024 at 11:00 AM. 翻译 |
| 10 |
07/30/2024
|
Re- NOTICE of Motion by Cory Jay Rosenbaum for presentment of motion to seal document, [4] before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 8/7/2024 at 11:00 AM. 翻译 |
| 9 |
07/26/2024
|
NOTICE of Motion by Cory Jay Rosenbaum for presentment of motion to seal document, 4 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 7/31/2024 at 11:00 AM. 翻译 |
| 8 |
07/26/2024
|
NOTICE of Motion by Cory Jay Rosenbaum for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief 3 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 7/31/2024 at 11:00 AM. 翻译 |
| 7 |
07/26/2024
|
NOTICE of Motion by Cory Jay Rosenbaum for presentment of motion for temporary restraining order 2 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 7/31/2024 at 11:00 AM. 翻译 |
| 6 |
07/24/2024
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. 翻译 |
| 5 |
07/24/2024
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). 翻译 |
| 4 |
07/24/2024
|
MOTION by Plaintiff jtle investments to seal document complaint 1, MOTION by Plaintiff jtle investmentsfor electronic service 3, MOTION by Plaintiff jtle investments for temporary restraining order 2 翻译 |
| 3 |
07/24/2024
|
MOTION by Plaintiff jtle investmentsfor electronic service 翻译 |
| 2 |
07/24/2024
|
MOTION by Plaintiff jtle investments for temporary restraining order 翻译 |
| 1 |
07/24/2024
|
COMPLAINT filed by jtle investments; jury demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22279306. 翻译 |