2024-cv-05280 +组团 近期案件➥ 订阅
原告律所：Concord & Sage PC
品牌：360°旋转拍照设备
小提示：专注TRO和解/应诉，需要起诉文件/被告名单/其他帮助可联系我们，微信右上角“···”可全文翻译/分享找队友/订阅可自动推送此案最新进展
微信扫码联系我们
| # | Date | Description |
| 71 |
11/17/2025
|
PROPOSED Case Management Order by Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited 翻译 |
| 70 |
10/28/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Telephonic status hearing held on 10/28/2025. As discussed on the record, the parties are directed to meet and confer to discuss a case management schedule. An in-person status hearing is set for 11/18/2025 at 10:00 A.M. in Courtroom 2125. Lead counsel for all appearing parties must be present. That hearing will be stricken upon the filing of a stipulation of dismissal. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 69 |
10/15/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: The Court sets a telephonic status hearing for 10/28/2025 at 9:30 A.M. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 1-855-244-8681, Access Code: 2315 003 3696. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 68 |
10/15/2025
|
ENTERED IN ERROR 翻译 |
| 67 |
10/15/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Motion by counsel to withdraw as attorney 73 is granted. Attorneys Qin Li and Ilya Zlatkin are withdrawn as counsel of record. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 66 |
10/14/2025
|
MOTION by Attorney Qin Li and Ilya Zlatkin to withdraw as attorney for Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited. No party information provided 翻译 |
| 65 |
10/06/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited by Wenyao Yang 翻译 |
| 64 |
09/10/2025
|
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 9/10/2025. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 63 |
09/08/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: In-person motion hearing held on 9/8/2025. The Court addressed Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction [26]. For the reasons discussed on the record, Plaintiff's motion is granted in part. Preliminary Injunction Order to be entered as to all parties with the exception of Defendants XAZIMO, EIJOFI, Huang-us, 360 Smart Booth, Inc. Enter separate preliminary injunction order. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 62 |
08/19/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal [65] pertaining to Defendant Luxury Looks (Def. No. 148). Accordingly, Defendant Luxury Looks is dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P 21 ("On motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party."). The motion for reconsideration [58] of Defendant Luxury Looks is dismissed as moot. An in-person hearing on Plaintiff's pending motion [26] seeking a preliminary injunction is set for 9/8/2025 at 10:00 A.M. Lead counsel for all interested parties must appear in-person at that hearing; no exceptions to that requirement will be granted, but the hearing will be stricken upon the filing of stipulation of dismissal or notice of settlement as to all interested parties. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 61 |
08/11/2025
|
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited Notice of Settlement and Dismissal Under Rule 41(A)(1) as to Certain Defendants 翻译 |
| 60 |
08/07/2025
|
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited Notice of Settlement and Dismissal Under Rule 41(A)(1) as to Certain Defendants 翻译 |
| 59 |
06/04/2025
|
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited Notice of Settlement and Dismissal Under Rule 41(A)(1) as to Certain Defendants 翻译 |
| 58 |
05/07/2025
|
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited Notice of Settlement and Dismissal Under Rule 41(A)(1) as to Certain Defendants 翻译 |
| 57 |
05/05/2025
|
Plaintiffs Statement Regarding Defendant Luxury Looks STATEMENT by Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited 翻译 |
| 56 |
04/29/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Telephonic status hearing held on 4/29/2025. As discussed on the record, Plaintiff is directed to file a written statement whether it wishes to continue the case against Defendant Luxury Looks or will instead seek to voluntarily dismiss the claims against that Defendant. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 55 |
04/18/2025
|
RESPONSE by Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limitedin Opposition to MOTION by Defendant Luxury Looks for reconsideration [58] 翻译 |
| 54 |
04/15/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Telephonic status hearing held on 4/15/2025. Plaintiff is given leave to file a response to Defendant Luxury Looks' motion for reconsideration [58] on or before 4/18/2025. Defendant's reply, if any, is due on or before 4/22/2025. A telephonic motion hearing is set for 4/29/2025 at 9:30 A.M. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 1-855-244-8681, Access Code: 2315 003 3696. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 53 |
04/12/2025
|
ANSWER to counterclaim filed by XAZIMO, 360 Smart Photo Booth Inc., EIJOFI, Huang-us, by Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited 翻译 |
| 52 |
04/03/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: A telephonic motion hearing on Defendant Luxury Looks' motion for reconsideration [58] is set for 4/15/2025 at 9:30 A.M. Defendant Luxury Looks, which failed to appear at the previous hearing in this matter (see Dkt. [55]), is specifically warned that, if it does not appear by telephone in support of its motion for reconsideration, the motion will be summarily denied. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 1-855-244-8681, Access Code: 2315 003 3696. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 51 |
03/31/2025
|
MOTION by Defendant Luxury Looks for reconsideration of order granting motion to dismiss. (Received via Box.com 3/31/25) 翻译 |
| 50 |
03/28/2025
|
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited Notice of Settlement and Dismissal Under Rule 41(A)(1) as to Certain Defendants 翻译 |
| 49 |
03/21/2025
|
ANSWER to amended complaint, COUNTERCLAIM filed by XAZIMO, 360 Smart Photo Booth Inc., EIJOFI, Huang-us against Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited. by XAZIMO, 360 Smart Photo Booth Inc., EIJOFI, Huang-us 翻译 |
| 48 |
03/12/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: In-person motion hearing held on 3/12/2025. For the reasons stated on the record, the motion to dismiss [39] of Defendant Luxury Looks (which did not appear at the hearing) is denied. Defendant Luxury Looks must answer Plaintiff's complaint on or before 4/2/2025. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction [26] is taken under advisement. Defendants are given leave to file an amended answer and counterclaim on or before 3/21/2025. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 47 |
03/13/2025
|
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited Declaration of Qin Li 翻译 |
| 46 |
03/05/2025
|
ANSWER to counterclaim by Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited 翻译 |
| 45 |
02/26/2025
|
SUPPLEMENT to reply to response to motion 51 翻译 |
| 44 |
02/25/2025
|
REPLY by Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited to memorandum in opposition to motion 37, memorandum in opposition to motion, 36 翻译 |
| 43 |
02/25/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time to Reply 48 is granted. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 42 |
02/24/2025
|
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited Notice of Settlement and Dismissal Under Rule 41(A)(1) as to Certain Defendants 翻译 |
| 41 |
02/18/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited for extension of time to file response/reply as to memorandum in opposition to motion 37, memorandum in opposition to motion, 36 翻译 |
| 40 |
02/12/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: In-person motion hearing held on 2/12/2025. Plaintiff's response to Defendants' opposition to its motion for preliminary injunction shall be filed on or before 2/18/2025. Plaintiff's response to Defendant Luxury Looks' motion to dismiss 39 shall be filed on or before 3/6/2025. Defendants' motion to unseal 34 is granted. The Clerk is directed to unseal all sealed entries on the docket. Defendants' motions 23, 31, 33 are dismissed as moot. An in-person status hearing is set for 3/12/2025 at 9:30 A.M. Lead counsel is directed to be present at the hearing. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 39 |
02/14/2025
|
RESPONSE by Defendant Luxury Looks (Received via pro se email on 2/14/25.) 翻译 |
| 38 |
02/12/2025
|
ANSWER to amended complaint, COUNTERCLAIM filed by Evegogo Store, Vanplex Photo Booth Store, Furmores Official Store, Shenzhen Hywinlife Co., Ltd, Shenzhen SeenTok Co, Ltd, SX LLC, Sabeeney, Rossmine Official Store, Shenzhen Vanplex Co., Ltd., HYWINLIFE Official Store, ACHHA TECHNOLOGY INC, FTY360, Shenzhen WiViTouch Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Rossmine Co., Ltd., TOPS Tech, Shenzhen Qunan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., FASHINN360, Shenzhen Furmores Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen Fantasy View Technology Co., Ltd. against Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited. by Evegogo Store, Vanplex Photo Booth Store, Furmores Official Store, Shenzhen Hywinlife Co., Ltd, Shenzhen SeenTok Co, Ltd, SX LLC, Sabeeney, Rossmine Official Store, Shenzhen Vanplex Co., Ltd., HYWINLIFE Official Store, ACHHA TECHNOLOGY INC, FTY360, Shenzhen WiViTouch Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Rossmine Co., Ltd., TOPS Tech, Shenzhen Qunan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., FASHINN360, Shenzhen Furmores Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen Fantasy View Technology Co., Ltd. 翻译 |
| 37 |
02/12/2025
|
MEMORANDUM by Shenzhen Qunan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. in Opposition to motion for preliminary injunction 26 翻译 |
| 36 |
02/11/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited by Ilya Zlatkin 翻译 |
| 35 |
02/11/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Shenzhen Qunan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. by Benjamin Solter 翻译 |
| 34 |
02/11/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants 360 Smart Photo Booth Inc., Huang-us, EIJOFI, XAZIMO by Benjamin Solter 翻译 |
| 33 |
02/10/2025
|
ANSWER to amended complaint by 360 Smart Photo Booth Inc., Huang-us, EIJOFI, XAZIMO 翻译 |
| 32 |
02/06/2025
|
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Luxury Looks, MOTION by Defendant Luxury Looks to Dismiss for Lack of Involvement. (Received via Box.com 2/6/25) 翻译 |
| 31 |
02/04/2025
|
DECLARATION of Honghan Shi regarding memorandum in opposition to motion 37 翻译 |
| 30 |
02/04/2025
|
MEMORANDUM by 360 Smart Photo Booth Inc., Huang-us, EIJOFI, XAZIMO in Opposition to motion for preliminary injunction 26 翻译 |
| 29 |
02/03/2025
|
MEMORANDUM by FASHINN360, TOPS Tech, Shenzhen Vanplex Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Hywinlife Co., Ltd, Shenzhen Rossmine Co., Ltd., Shenzhen WiViTouch Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Fantasy View Technology Co., Ltd., Chengdu Tops Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Furmores Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen SeenTok Co, Ltd, Furmores Official Store, HYWINLIFE Official Store, Rossmine Official Store, Evegogo Store, Vanplex Photo Booth Store, Huang-us, Sabeeney, ACHHA TECHNOLOGY INC, FTY360, SX LLC in Opposition to motion for preliminary injunction 26 翻译 |
| 28 |
01/31/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: The Court sets an in-person motion hearing for 2/12/2025 at 10:00 A.M. in Courtroom 2125. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 27 |
01/27/2025
|
MOTION by Defendants FASHINN360, TOPS Tech, Shenzhen Vanplex Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Hywinlife Co., Ltd, Shenzhen Rossmine Co., Ltd., Shenzhen WiViTouch Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Fantasy View Technology Co., Ltd., Chengdu Tops Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Furmores Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen SeenTok Co, Ltd, Furmores Official Store, HYWINLIFE Official Store, Rossmine Official Store, Evegogo Store, Vanplex Photo Booth Store, Sabeeney, ACHHA TECHNOLOGY INC, FTY360, SX LLC to unseal case 翻译 |
| 26 |
01/27/2025
|
MOTION by Defendants 360 Smart Photo Booth Inc., Huang-us, EIJOFI, XAZIMO to set a briefing schedule jointly filed with defendants: Sabeeney, ACHHA TECHNOLOGY INC, FTY360, SX LLC, FASHINN360, TOPS Tech, Shenzhen Vanplex Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Hywinlife Co., Ltd, Shenzhen Rossmine Co., Ltd., Shenzhen WiViTouch Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Fantasy View Technology Co., Ltd., Chengdu Tops Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Furmores Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen SeenTok Co, Ltd, Furmores Official Store, HYWINLIFE Official Store, Rossmine Official Store, Evegogo Store, Vanplex Photo Booth Store 翻译 |
| 25 |
01/27/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant 360 Smart Photo Booth Inc. by Jiyuan Zhang 翻译 |
| 24 |
01/27/2025
|
MOTION by Defendants FROECTRY-360 PHOTO BOOTH, FOOTIELD-360 Photo Booth to confirm FROECTRY-360 PHOTO BOOTH and FOOTIELD-360 PHOTO BOOTH are not included in the Schedule A list 翻译 |
| 23 |
01/23/2025
|
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 1/22/2025, answer due 2/12/2025. 翻译 |
| 22 |
01/22/2025
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A 翻译 |
| 21 |
01/21/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion 26 for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, which is entered and continued, Plaintiff must forthwith serve all Defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no Defendant appears and objects on or before 1/27/2025." Plaintiff must file proof of service of the Court's statement within two business days of service. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 20 |
01/14/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Sabeeney, ACHHA TECHNOLOGY INC, FTY360, SX LLC, FASHINN360, TOPS Tech, Shenzhen Vanplex Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Hywinlife Co., Ltd, Shenzhen Rossmine Co., Ltd., Shenzhen WiViTouch Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Fantasy View Technology Co., Ltd., Chengdu Tops Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Furmores Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen SeenTok Co, Ltd, Furmores Official Store, HYWINLIFE Official Store, Rossmine Official Store, Evegogo Store, Vanplex Photo Booth Store by Benjamin Solter 翻译 |
| 19 |
01/12/2025
|
MEMORANDUM by Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited in support of motion for preliminary injunction 26 翻译 |
| 18 |
01/12/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited for preliminary injunction 翻译 |
| 17 |
12/30/2024
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Huang-us, EIJOFI, XAZIMO, FROECTRY-360 PHOTO BOOTH, FOOTIELD-360 Photo Booth by Jiyuan Zhang 翻译 |
| 16 |
12/30/2024
|
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited Notice of Settlement and Dismissal Under Rule 41(A)(1) as to Certain Defendants 翻译 |
| 15 |
12/15/2024
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited for extension of time of TRO 翻译 |
| 14 |
12/12/2024
|
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited Notice of Settlement and Dismissal Under Rule 41(A)(1) as to Certain Defendant 翻译 |
| 13 |
12/05/2024
|
BOND in the amount of $ 10,000, cashier's check Receipt No.100013875 posted by Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited 翻译 |
| 12 |
12/02/2024
|
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 12/2/2024. Modified on 2/19/2025. 翻译 |
| 11 |
12/02/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order 7, and motion for electronic service of process 11 are granted in part. Plaintiff's submissions (e.g., Dkt. 8 6-8) establish that, were Defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of Plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that Defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis under FRCP 65(b)(1). Specifically, and as noted above, were Defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating Plaintiff's interests in identifying Defendants, stopping Defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining the equitable accounting that, at this point, Plaintiff states that it may pursue. These facts justify, among other relief, the imposition of a prejudgment asset restraint against Defendants in an amount not to exceed $50,000 per separate account. In addition, the Court finds, at least for now on this limited and one-sided record and without prejudice to revisiting the issue, that it has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because they directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois. Specifically, Defendants have targeted sales to Illinois residents by setting up and operating e-commerce stores that target United States consumers using one or more Seller Aliases, offer shipping to the United States, including Illinois, accept payment in U.S. dollars, and have sold products using infringing versions of Plaintiff's patented works to residents of Illinois. The evidence presented to the Court also shows that Plaintiff has demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to Plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by infringing goods, and there is no countervailing harm to Defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to Defendants. As several judges have previously noted, there may be reason to question the propriety of joining all Defendants in this one action, but at this preliminary stage, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity and the prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all Defendants. The disabling of domain names is appropriate to prevent infringing conduct. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify Defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any Defendant appears and objects, the Court will reconsider the asset freeze and joinder. Enter sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 10 |
10/23/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's "Motion for Decision" 18 is denied. Plaintiff's pending "Schedule A" routine motions, of which the Court is aware, will be addressed in due course. Mailed notice 翻译 |
| 9 |
10/22/2024
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited for hearing re MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe for temporary restraining order and expedited discovery 7 翻译 |
| 8 |
08/08/2024
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited by Zhiwei Hua 翻译 |
| 7 |
08/08/2024
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited by Qin Li 翻译 |
| 6 |
08/08/2024
|
NEW PARTIES: Marvel Technology (China) Co., Limited added to case caption. Terminating John Doe 翻译 |
| 5 |
08/08/2024
|
CIVIL Cover Sheet 翻译 |
| 4 |
08/08/2024
|
AMENDED complaint by John Doe against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A 翻译 |
| 3 |
08/02/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion 12 for leave to file under seal and to proceed anonymously is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's submissions establish that, were Defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of Plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that Defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Conversely, there are no exceptional circumstances that would justify allowing Plaintiff to conceal its own identity: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for preliminary injunctive relief will be adjudicated in the ordinary course of so-called "Schedule A" litigation, and the identity of Defendants will be placed under seal during the pendency of the ex parte proceedings. Given these protections for Plaintiff's legitimate interests, the countervailing strong public interest in knowing who is seeking recourse in the federal courts compels the Court to deny Plaintiff's request to conceal its own identity, even initially. As the Seventh Circuit has explained, "We have repeatedly voiced our disfavor of parties proceeding anonymously, as anonymous litigation runs contrary to the rights of the public to have open judicial proceedings and to know who is using court facilities and procedures funded by public taxes. To proceed anonymously, a party must demonstrate exceptional circumstances that outweigh both the public policy in favor of identified parties and the prejudice to the opposing party that would result from anonymity." Doe v. Village of Deerfield, 819 F.3d 372, 376-77 (7th Cir. 2016); see also Doe v. Smith, 429 F.3d 706, 710 (7th Cir. 2005) ("The public has an interest in knowing what the judicial system is doing, an interest frustrated when any part of litigation is conducted in secret."); Doe v. Trustees of Indiana Univ., 101 F.4th 485, 493 (7th Cir. 2024) (district judge "abused his discretion when permitting 'John Doe' to conceal his name without finding that he is a minor, is at risk of physical harm, or faces improper retaliation."). Such exceptional circumstances as to justify anonymity are not present in this case. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion proceed anonymously is denied. Subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, Plaintiff may for now file the documents appearing at docket entries 3, 9, and 10. Plaintiff's request to file the documents appearing at docket entry 2 is denied, as Plaintiff is not entitled to hide the relevant information concerning its asserted patent. Plaintiff must file an amended complaint bearing its true name (not under seal) within 5 business days or the case will be dismissed with prejudice. All other pending motions will be addressed by separate order in due course. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 2 |
07/30/2024
|
MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe for leave to file under seal and to proceed under a pseudonym 翻译 |
| 1 |
07/30/2024
|
MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe electronic service of process pursuant to FRCP 4(f)(3) 翻译 |