2023-cv-17065 +组团 近期案件➥ 订阅
原告律所：Bishop Diehl & Lee, Ltd.
品牌：LED发光面具
小提示：专注TRO和解/应诉，需要起诉文件/被告名单/其他帮助可联系我们，微信右上角“···”可全文翻译/分享找队友/订阅可自动推送此案最新进展
微信扫码联系我们
| # | Date | Description |
| 72 |
08/21/2025
|
SUPPLEMENT to ECF 90 re Updated Contact Information for Defendants guizhoujundeyangwangluokejiyouxiangongsi, guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi. Corrected email information: 18385312050@163.com 翻译 |
| 71 |
08/19/2025
|
STATUS Report by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd 翻译 |
| 70 |
08/11/2025
|
ORDER: The motion of Joseph A. Farco to withdraw, 90, is granted in part. The motion is granted insofar as it seeks leave to withdraw as counsel. However, the motion is denied insofar as it seeks a stay of this action. The previously-set deadlines for written discovery, see 89, stand. The motion of Timothy E. Horton and Daniel C. Leonardi to withdraw, 91, is granted. Joseph A. Farco, Timothy E. Horton, and Daniel C. Leonardi are terminated Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 8/11/2025: Mailed notice 翻译 |
| 69 |
08/09/2025
|
MOTION by Attorney Timothy E. Horton & Daniel C. Leonardi to withdraw as attorney for guizhoujundeyangwangluokejiyouxiangongsi, guizhouwuminghanwang. New address information: Felicia Liu, felicia@imingtu.com, Room 3-15, Block B, Building D, Shunda Jinmao Plaza, Outer Ring Road, Zhonghua Road Sub-district, Honghuangang District, Zunyi City, Guizhou Province, China 563000 翻译 |
| 68 |
08/08/2025
|
MOTION by Attorney Joseph A. Farco, Esq. to withdraw as attorney for guizhoujundeyangwangluokejiyouxiangongsi, guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi. New address information: Felicia Liu, felicia@imingtu.com, Room 3-15, Block B, Building D, Shunda Jinmao Plaza, Outer Ring Road, Zhonghua Road Sub-district, Honghuangang District, Zunyi City, Guizhou Province, China 563000 翻译 |
| 67 |
08/06/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has reviewed the minute entry memorializing the status hearing held by the assigned magistrate judge, which indicates that defendants' representative informed plaintiff's counsel that it does not intend to respond to discovery or otherwise participate in this case. 88. But "[w]hen a defendant requests a dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction, it submits itself to the jurisdiction and power of the court for the limited purpose of deciding the jurisdictional issue." Draper, Inc. v. Mechoshade Sys., Inc., 2011 WL 1258140, at *1 (S.D. Ind. 2011). Accordingly, plaintiff shall serve written discovery, including any interrogatories or requests for discovery, on defendants by 9/5/2025. Defendants shall serve their responses by 9/19/2025. Defendants are advised that failure to respond to discovery requests may result in sanctions, including directing that plaintiff's jurisdictional allegations "be taken as established for purposes of [this] action." Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(i); see Ins. Corp. of Ireland, Ltd. v. Compagnie des Bauxities de Guinee, 456 U.S. 694, 705 (1982) (holding that discovery sanctions under Rule 37(b)(2)(A) are permissible in jurisdictional discovery); Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Cammon, 1989 WL 153558, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 7, 1989) ("[W]here the party served fails to respond to a discovery request in any way, the court may impose sanctions directly, without first issuing an order to compel discovery."). 翻译 |
| 66 |
08/05/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng: Telephone status hearing held on 8/5/2025. Defendants did not appear. Plaintiff's counsel represented that defense counsel informed him that they intend to withdraw from the case. In addition, plaintiff's counsel spoke with defendants' representative in China on 7/23/2025 who indicated that defendants will not be responding to discovery or otherwise participating in the case. As a result, plaintiff's counsel intends to move for default judgment. Based on these representations, all matters relating to the referral are concluded. The referral is terminated. By 8/19/2025, plaintiff shall file with the District Judge either its motion for default judgment or a status report updating the Court on an anticipated filing date. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 65 |
07/31/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng: The Court has reviewed the parties 7/22/2025 joint status report 86. Telephone status hearing is set for 8/5/2025 at 9:30 a.m. The call-in number for the hearing is (650) 479-3207 and the access code is 2306 793 6027. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to the hearing. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 64 |
07/22/2025
|
STATUS Report Plaintiff's status report by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd Presented before District Judge 翻译 |
| 63 |
07/16/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng: This case has been referred for discovery supervision and scheduling (including jurisdictional discovery as to defendant Guizhouwuminghangluokejiyouxiangongsi), to set a deadline to file any motions for leave to amend the pleadings, to set a dispositive motions schedule, and for settlement 84. By 7/29/2025, the parties shall file a joint status report setting forth the information in the Court's Standing Order for Initial Joint Status Reports. The joint status report shall also propose a schedule for fact and jurisdictional discovery and set forth what discovery has been completed, what discovery remains, and whether any discovery disputes require the Court's attention. The parties are advised that they may contact this Court's courtroom deputy if at any point they are mutually interested in scheduling a settlement conference with the Court. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 62 |
07/15/2025
|
Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery supervision and scheduling (including jurisdictional discovery as to defendant Guizhouwuminghangluokejiyouxiangongsi), to set a deadline to file any motions for leave to amend the pleadings, to set a dispositive motions schedule, and for settlement. 翻译 |
| 61 |
07/15/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The case was called for oral argument on 7/15/2025. Defendant failed to appear. Plaintiff's counsel appeared and argued the pending motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction and dismiss the amended complaint, 58. For the reasons stated on the record, Defendant Guizhouwuminghangluokejiyouxiangongsi's motion to dismiss the amended complaint, 58, is denied without prejudice to its renewal after the parties participate in jurisdictional discovery. Defendant's motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction, 58, is also denied without prejudice to its potential renewal. The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 7/22/2025 proposing how jurisdictional discovery should proceed. 翻译 |
| 60 |
05/19/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: This court's minute entry, 81, was entered in error and is stricken. Oral argument on defendant's motion to dismiss, 58, is set for 7/15/2025 at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2325. The parties will be given 30 minutes each to argue the motion. 翻译 |
| 59 |
05/19/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Telephone ruling on defendant's motion to dismiss, 58, is set for 7/15/2025 at 1:00 p.m. CT. The court will rule on the basis of the parties' filings; no argument is necessary. If the parties have reached a settlement or jointly request that the court stay the ruling to allow the parties to exhaust settlement possibilities, the parties should file a joint notice with the court as soon as possible and no later than 24 hours before the hearing. To join the telephone hearing please dial 650-479-3207 and enter access code 2315 996 7380#. Press # when prompted for an attendee number. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. 翻译 |
| 58 |
05/14/2025
|
STATUS Report by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd 翻译 |
| 57 |
05/13/2025
|
ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 5/13/2025: The court has received plaintiff's status report. 78. On 4/22/2025, the court ordered the parties to file a joint status report by 4/29/2025 proposing dates for oral argument on defendant's motion to dismiss, 58, within the next two months. See 76. The parties did not do so. The court sua sponte extended the deadline to submit a status report to 5/8/2025. Rather than submitting a joint status report with proposed dates, plaintiff submitted a status report indicating that on 5/8/2025that is, the day the status report was due-plaintiff "conferred with Defendant's counsel regarding a mutually agreeable date for oral argument on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss." 78 11. Plaintiff did not provide any proposed dates. By 5/14/2025, the parties must file a status report proposing dates for oral argument on defendant's motion to dismiss within the next two months. As this is the third time the court is directing a joint status report with proposed dates, if the parties fail to file a status report by that date, the court may conclude that plaintiff has lost interest in pursuing the case and may dismiss the case for want of prosecution and / or failure to comply with court orders. 翻译 |
| 56 |
05/08/2025
|
STATUS Report by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd 翻译 |
| 55 |
05/01/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: On 4/22/2025, the court ordered the parties to file a joint status report by 4/29/2025 proposing dates for oral argument on defendant's motion to dismiss, 58, within the next two months. See 76. The parties did not do so. By 5/8/2025, the parties must file a status report proposing dates for oral argument on defendant's motion to dismiss within the next two months. As this is the second time the court is directing a joint status report, if the parties fail to file a status report by that date, the court may conclude that plaintiff has lost interest in pursuing the case and may dismiss the case for want of prosecution and / or failure to comply with court orders. 翻译 |
| 54 |
04/22/2025
|
ORDER: Telephone motion hearing held on 4/22/25. Plaintiff's motion to withdraw as counsel, 74, is granted. Qi Men is granted leave to with his appearance. Sameeul Haque's appearance, 75, was filed on the docket in error and is hereby stricken. Qi Men and Sameeul Haque are terminated as counsel. Alexander Warden has already filed his appearance on behalf of plaintiff. The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 4/29/25 proposing dates for oral argument on defendant's motion to dismiss, 58, within the next two months. Each party will be given 30 minutes to argue the motion to dismiss, 58. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 4/22/2025: Mailed notice 翻译 |
| 53 |
04/17/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd by Sameeul Haque 翻译 |
| 52 |
04/16/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's oral motion to strike motion 71 because it was filed on the wrong docket is granted. Plaintiff's motion to withdraw as counsel, 71, is stricken. 翻译 |
| 51 |
04/15/2025
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Telephone motion hearing on the pending motions to withdraw, 70, 71, is set for 4/22/2025 at 9:15 a.m. CT. To join the telephone hearing please dial 650-479-3207 and enter access code 2315 996 7380#. Press # when prompted for an attendee number. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. 翻译 |
| 50 |
04/10/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd by Alexander Warden 翻译 |
| 49 |
04/10/2025
|
MOTION by Attorney Qi Men to withdraw as attorney for Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd. No party information provided 翻译 |
| 48 |
04/10/2025
|
MOTION by Attorney Qi Men to withdraw as attorney for Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd. No party information provided 翻译 |
| 47 |
03/26/2025
|
STATUS Report by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd 翻译 |
| 46 |
03/20/2025
|
STATUS Report Responsive to Plaintiff's Status Report 61 by guizhoujundeyangwangluokejiyouxiangongsi, guizhouwuminghanwang, guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi 翻译 |
| 45 |
03/20/2025
|
STATUS Report by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd 翻译 |
| 44 |
03/20/2025
|
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion to withdraw the appearance of Nicholas S. Lee as counsel of record 65 is granted. Nicholas S. Lee terminated. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/20/2025: Mailed notice 翻译 |
| 43 |
03/20/2025
|
MOTION by Attorney Nicholas S. Lee to withdraw as attorney for Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd. No party information provided 翻译 |
| 42 |
03/19/2025
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd by Qi Men 翻译 |
| 41 |
02/18/2025
|
ORDER: Edward L. Bishop, Benjamin A. Campbell, and Sameeul Haque's motion to withdraw as counsel of record for plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co., Ltd., 62, is granted. Edward L. Bishop, Benjamin A. Campbell, and Sameeul Haque are terminated. All deadlines in this case are stayed through 3/20/2025 to allow plaintiff time to formalize representation with the remaining counsel of record, Nicholas S. Lee. By 3/20/2025, plaintiff should file a status report indicating whether it has formalized representation with the remaining counsel of record. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 2/18/2025: Mailed notice 翻译 |
| 40 |
02/13/2025
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd to withdraw as Counsel and Stay Deadlines 翻译 |
| 39 |
01/30/2025
|
REPLY by guizhoujundeyangwangluokejiyouxiangongsi to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi 58 翻译 |
| 38 |
01/16/2025
|
RESPONSE by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltdin Opposition to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi 58 翻译 |
| 37 |
12/27/2024
|
ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/27/2024: Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 36 |
12/17/2024
|
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi 翻译 |
| 35 |
12/12/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant's motion for leave to file excess pages 56 is granted. By 12/19/2024, defendant should re-file its motion to dissolve preliminary injunction and dismiss the amended complaint and any supporting memorandum on the docket. Defendant's memorandum in support should not exceed 30 pages. Plaintiff's response is due by 1/16/2025 and should not exceed 30 pages. Defendant's reply, if any, is due by 1/30/2025 and should not exceed 20 pages. If the parties request any extension of the schedule, they should confer and file an agreed proposed schedule. 翻译 |
| 34 |
12/10/2024
|
MOTION by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi for leave to file excess pages In Its Memo in Support of Its Motion to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction and Dismiss the Complaint (Contested) 翻译 |
| 33 |
11/20/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has reviewed plaintiff's response, 54, to the court's 11/1/2024 minute entry, 52, which directed plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the joinder restrictions in 35 U.S.C. § 299. For purposes of the show-cause order, the court finds that plaintiff has discharged its obligation to show that the joinder requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 299 and Rule 20 have been met. See Oakley, Inc. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 21-cv-536 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 6, 2021) (Docket No. 14). 翻译 |
| 32 |
11/08/2024
|
MEMORANDUM by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd Supplemental Memorandum Regarding the Propriety of Joinder 翻译 |
| 31 |
11/08/2024
|
AMENDED Schedule A 翻译 |
| 30 |
11/01/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's memorandum regarding the propriety of joinder. 50. Immediately prior to filing this memorandum, plaintiff voluntarily dismissed one of the defendants from the case, 49. Plaintiff has shown with respect to the remaining defendants that it has limited the claims to those based on "the same product" under 35 U.S.C. § 299. However, the "sameness of the accused products is not enough to establish that claims of infringement arise from the 'same transaction.'" In re EMC Corp., 677 F.3d 1351, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2012); see also Roadget Bus. Pte. Ltd. v. Individuals, Corps., Ltd. Liab. Companies, Partnerships, & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, No. 24-cv-607, 2024 WL 3338942, at *9 (N.D. Ill. July 9, 2024) (under Rule 20, "similar or even identical infringement by independent actors does not, standing alone, make infringement part of a common series of transactions or occurrences."). Plaintiff states that "[d]efendants, by selling identical products, either are the same entity or likely share a manufacturer or distributor, manufacturing or distributing the same infringing product." 50 at 3. Considering the cases cited above and the absence of other evidence supporting this contention, the court is not convinced. Plaintiff is ordered to file a supplemental memorandum by 11/15/2024 why this case should not be dismissed or severed for failure to comply with the joinder restrictions in 35 U.S.C. § 299 and under Rule 20. Mailed notice. (jn,) 翻译 |
| 29 |
11/01/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of dismissal 49, which seeks to voluntarily dismiss defendant No. 4 (DALEGDA Direct) from the case. But Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cr. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."). The court therefore construes plaintiffs' notice of voluntary dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by removing defendant No. 4 from the complaint, see Taylor, 787 F.3d at 857-58, and the court grants plaintiff leave to amend the pleadings. Plaintiff is directed to file an amended Schedule A form by 11/8/2024 identifying the remaining defendants. Mailed notice. (jn,) 翻译 |
| 28 |
10/23/2024
|
MEMORANDUM Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, terminate hearings, 48 by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd 翻译 |
| 27 |
10/23/2024
|
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd Under Rule 41(a)(1) DALEGDA Direct (Defendant 4) without prejudice 翻译 |
| 26 |
10/02/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The hearing set for 10/8/2024 is stricken. See 47. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause by 10/23/2024 why this case should not be dismissed or severed for failure to comply with the joinder restrictions in 35 U.S.C. § 299. See Hu v. The Individuals, P'ships and Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, No. 23-cv-05881, 9, 15, 23. Defendant Guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi's motion to dissolve preliminary injunction and dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, 37, is denied without prejudice to refiling once the joinder issue has been resolved. 翻译 |
| 25 |
10/01/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Telephone motion hearing on defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi's motion to dissolve preliminary injunction and dismiss the complaint 37 is set for 10/8/2024 at 8:45 a.m. CT. Dial toll-free call-in number (888) 684-9952; followed by the conference access code: 9482028#. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against recording and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violations of these prohibitions may result in sanction deemed necessary by the Court. 翻译 |
| 24 |
06/11/2024
|
RESPONSE by guizhoujundeyangwangluokejiyouxiangongsi in Support of MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi 37 翻译 |
| 23 |
05/28/2024
|
RESPONSE by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltdin Opposition to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi 37 翻译 |
| 22 |
05/03/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant's motion for leave to file excess pages, 42, is granted. Defendant's motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction and dismiss the complaint has already been filed on the docket, 37. Plaintiff's response brief should not exceed 30 pages, and defendant's reply brief should not exceed 20 pages. The briefing schedule for the motion stands. See 41. 翻译 |
| 21 |
05/03/2024
|
RESPONSE by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltdin Opposition to MOTION by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi for leave to file excess pages [CONTESTED/OPPOSED] 42 翻译 |
| 20 |
05/02/2024
|
MOTION by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi for leave to file excess pages [CONTESTED/OPPOSED] 翻译 |
| 19 |
05/01/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has reviewed the parties' joint status report, 40. Defendant's motion, 37, violates Local Rule 7.1. By 5/3/2024 defendant is directed to either file a motion for leave to file excess pages or withdraw the motion and file a motion that complies with Local Rule 7.1. If defendant files a motion for leave to file excess pages, defendant should confer with plaintiff and include agreed proposed page limits for the response and reply briefs. Unless defendant withdraws the motion, plaintiff's response is due by 5/28/2024. Defendant's reply, if any, is due by 6/11/2024. 翻译 |
| 18 |
04/29/2024
|
STATUS Report (Joint) by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd 翻译 |
| 17 |
04/25/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received defendant's motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction and dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, 37, and plaintiff's status report, 38. By 4/29/2024, plaintiff and defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi should file a joint status report with an agreed proposed briefing schedule for the motion. The joint status report should also update the court on the status of settlement between the parties. 翻译 |
| 16 |
04/23/2024
|
STATUS Report by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd 翻译 |
| 15 |
04/23/2024
|
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi 翻译 |
| 14 |
04/23/2024
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi by Daniel Charles Leonardi 翻译 |
| 13 |
04/23/2024
|
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant guizhoujundeyangwangluokejiyouxiangongsi by Timothy Edward Horton 翻译 |
| 12 |
04/23/2024
|
ORDER: Jospeh A. Farco's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice on behalf of defendants guizhoujundeyangwangluokejiyouxiangongsi and guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi, 33, is granted. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 4/23/2024. Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 11 |
04/22/2024
|
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-21883373. 翻译 |
| 10 |
04/18/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 4/23/2024, plaintiff should file a status report updating the court on the status of the case and proposed next steps. 翻译 |
| 9 |
03/11/2024
|
NEW PARTIES: DOE 1, DOE 2, guizhouwuminghanwang, DALEGDA Direct and LOUEBU added to case caption. 翻译 |
| 8 |
03/08/2024
|
ORDER : The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/8/2024: Mailed notice. 翻译 |
| 7 |
03/08/2024
|
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/8/2024: 翻译 |
| 6 |
03/08/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: No defendant has appeared or filed an objection to the motion for preliminary injunction, 24. A preliminary injunction is appropriate for the same reasons a TRO was granted and is unopposed. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 24 is granted. Enter Preliminary Injunction. The Clerk is directed to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to add all defendants listed on Exhibit 1 to the court's docket within three business days. Instructions on how to do so may be located on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/instructions. 翻译 |
| 5 |
03/06/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 3/7/24, plaintiff should submit to the proposed order inbox a proposed preliminary injunction order and a redline in accordance with the court's standing orders. 翻译 |
| 4 |
02/22/2024
|
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associates Identified on Schedule A on 2/20/2024, answer due 3/12/2024. 翻译 |
| 3 |
02/21/2024
|
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has taken the motion for preliminary injunction 24 under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by 3/4/2024. Plaintiff shall serve defendants with this notice. For the reasons stated in the court's orders entering and extending the TRO, as well as in plaintiff's earlier motion 19 to extend the TRO, the TRO is further extended to and including the date on which the court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. 翻译 |
| 2 |
02/20/2024
|
MEMORANDUM by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd in support of motion for preliminary injunction 24 翻译 |
| 1 |
02/20/2024
|
MOTION by Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd for preliminary injunction 翻译 |