2025-cv-05356 +组团 近期案件➥ 订阅 被告名单
原告律所：Sriplaw PA
品牌：Lacoste 鳄鱼品牌
小提示：专注TRO和解/应诉，需要起诉文件/被告名单/其他帮助可联系我们，微信右上角“···”可全文翻译/分享找队友/订阅可自动推送此案最新进展
微信扫码联系我们
| # | Date | Description |
| 16 |
10/06/2025
|
Letter 翻译 |
| 15 |
10/06/2025
|
Mailing Receipt 翻译 |
| 14 |
08/04/2025
|
DECLARATION OF INMATE FILING of George Burns. Document filed by George Burns. 翻译 |
| 13 |
07/22/2025
|
Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for [6] Notice of Appeal filed by George Burns were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. 翻译 |
| 12 |
07/22/2025
|
Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: [6] Notice of Appeal. 翻译 |
| 11 |
07/22/2025
|
Appeal Remark as to [6] Notice of Appeal filed by George Burns. IFP Denied 07/02/2025. 翻译 |
| 10 |
07/22/2025
|
NOTICE OF APPEAL from [4] Judgment, [3] Order of Dismissal. Document filed by George Burns. Form D-P is due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. 翻译 |
| 9 |
07/16/2025
|
MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Document filed by George Burns. 翻译 |
| 8 |
07/02/2025
|
Mailing Receipt 翻译 |
| 7 |
07/02/2025
|
CIVIL JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in the June 30, 2025, order, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. � 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/2/2025) 翻译 |
| 6 |
06/30/2025
|
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. � 1915(g): The Court denies Plaintiff's request to proceed IFP, and dismisses this action without prejudice, pursuant to the PLRA's "three-strikes" provision. See 28 U.S.C. � 1915(g). Plaintiff remains barred, under Section 1915(g), from filing any future federal civil action IFP while he is a prisoner, unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time that he files his complaint. Id. The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. � 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter a judgment dismissing this action for the reasons set forth in this order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 6/30/2025) (vfr) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. 翻译 |
| 5 |
07/01/2025
|
Mailing Receipt 翻译 |
| 4 |
06/30/2025
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. 翻译 |
| 3 |
06/30/2025
|
CASE MANAGEMENT NOTE: For each electronic filing made in a case involving a self-represented party who has not consented to electronic service, the filing party must serve the document on such self-represented party in a manner permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2) (other than through the ECF system) and file proof of service for each document so served. Please see Rule 9.2 of the courts ECF Rules & Instructions for further information. 翻译 |
| 2 |
06/30/2025
|
STANDING ORDER IN RE CASES FILED BY PRO SE PLAINTIFFS (See 24-MISC-127 Standing Order filed March 18, 2024). To ensure that all cases heard in the Southern District of New York are handled promptly and efficiently, all parties must keep the court apprised of any new contact information. It is a party's obligation to provide an address for service; service of court orders cannot be accomplished if a party does not update the court when a change of address occurs. Accordingly, all self-represented litigants are hereby ORDERED to inform the court of each change in their address or electronic contact information. Parties may consent to electronic service to receive notifications of court filings by email, rather than relying on regular mail delivery. Parties may also ask the court for permission to file documents electronically. Forms, including instructions for consenting to electronic service and requesting permission to file documents electronically, may be found by clicking on the hyperlinks in this order, or by accessing the forms on the courts website, nysd.uscourts.gov/forms. The procedures that follow apply only to cases filed by pro se plaintiffs. If the court receives notice from the United States Postal Service that an order has been returned to the court, or otherwise receives information that the address of record for a self-represented plaintiff is no longer valid, the court may issue an Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with this order. Such order will be sent to the plaintiffs last known address and will also be viewable on the court's electronic docket. A notice directing the parties' attention to this order shall be docketed (and mailed to any self-represented party that has appeared and has not consented to electronic service) upon the opening of each case or miscellaneous matter that is classified as pro se in the court's records. (Signed by Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/18/2024) 翻译 |
| 1 |
06/25/2025
|
COMPLAINT against Thandi. Document filed by George Burns. 翻译 |