2025-cv-23135 +组团 近期案件➥ 订阅
原告律所：TME
品牌：Sega & Colorful Stage! & Like a Dragon
小提示：专注TRO和解/应诉，需要起诉文件/被告名单/其他帮助可联系我们，微信右上角“···”可全文翻译/分享找队友/订阅可自动推送此案最新进展
微信扫码联系我们
| # | Date | Description |
| 24 |
10/27/2025
|
PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING MOTIONS. THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, Plaintiff's Renewed Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order (DE [25]) and Plaintiff's Renewed Ex Parte Motion for Electronic Service of Process (DE [26]) are REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Enjolique Lett for any appropriate action authorized by law. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 10/27/2025. 翻译 |
| 23 |
10/24/2025
|
EXHIBITS 1-4 by Sega Corporation. Related document: [23] Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal filed by Sega Corporation. 翻译 |
| 22 |
10/22/2025
|
Order 翻译 |
| 21 |
10/22/2025
|
AMENDED COMPLAINT against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave, filed by Sega Corporation. 翻译 |
| 20 |
10/16/2025
|
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration and Clarification or for Leave to Amend the Complaint (DE 20) ("Motion"). In the Motion, Plaintiff requests that the Court reconsider its Order dismissing this case without prejudice (DE 19) ("Dismissal Order"), and find either that Plaintiff was not in violation of the Court's Notice of Court Practices and Procedures (DE 6) ("Notice") or that Plaintiff be given leave to amend its Complaint (DE 1) to bring the Complaint into compliance with the Notice's requirements. Plaintiff argues that the Notice does not prohibit a complaint from including a request for temporary or preliminary relief, but merely requires that a proper, separate motion for such relief also be filed. (DE 20 at 5). But that interpretation is inconsistent with the language of the Notice, which requires that any request for temporary or preliminary injunctive relief be made separate from the Complaint; that the Notice mandates any violative Complaint be amended to conform with the Notice and that the Notice's only constraint on the Complaint is that it does not include the specified initial requests for relief, is another, contextual clue that the directive was not additive. See Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 167 (2012) (guiding that interpretation of a legal text should "consider the entire text, in view of its structure and of the physical and logical relation of its many parts."). Plaintiff's assertion that the "Federal Rules require such relief to be included at the initial pleading stage" is unsupported. Nothing about Rule 8(a)(3), Rule 65(b)(1)(A), or any cases Plaintiff cites requires temporary or preliminary injunctive relief to be requested in an initial pleading. Rather, those rules collectively require that if a final equitable remedy is sought, it be pled, and that any injunctive relief be supported by a well-pled cause of action. See, e.g., Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 1092, 1097-1100 (11th Cir. 2004) (explaining that a plaintiff "must be able to articulate a basis for relief that would withstand scrutiny under [Rule] 12(b)(6)" to obtain a "traditional injunction," but nowhere suggesting that a plaintiff must request temporary or preliminary injunctive relief in the complaint). Plaintiff points out that "Courts in the Southern District of Florida routinely consider injunctive requests set out in complaints." (DE 20 at 6). Plaintiff also notes that this Court has granted injunctive relief based on other complaints containing similar language. (Id. at 6-7). However, these examples are irrelevant and unpersuasive where, in this case, the practice at issue was explicitly prohibited. Plaintiff did not amend its Complaint as required, and the Court sanctioned Plaintiff for that failure, as it warned it would. Nonethless, the Court recognizes that Plaintiff's error was the result of a misunderstanding rather than a willful violation and that no Party would be prejudiced by the requested amendment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) ("The court should freely give leave [to amend a pleading] when justice so requires."). Accordingly, upon review of the record and the Motion, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion (DE 20) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint, which is compliant with the Court's Notice, on or before October 30, 2025. This case is REOPENED. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 10/16/2025. 翻译 |
| 19 |
10/16/2025
|
Case Reopened. See (DE 22). 翻译 |
| 18 |
10/15/2025
|
NOTICE of Correction by Sega Corporation re [20] MOTION for Reconsideration re [19] Order Dismissing/Closing Case 翻译 |
| 17 |
10/14/2025
|
MOTION for Reconsideration re [19] Order Dismissing/Closing Case, by Sega Corporation. 翻译 |
| 16 |
09/30/2025
|
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. On July 18, 2025, the Court entered a Notice of Court Practices and Procedures (DE 6), which ordered, in part, that "[a]ny request for. entry of temporary restraining order, or entry of preliminary injunction must be filed separately from the Complaint[.]" The Order further specified that "[t]o the extent the operative Complaint is not in compliance with the terms of this Order, Plaintiff shall promptly file an Amended Complaint WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS of the date of this Order[,]" and that "[n]oncompliance with any provision of this Order. may subject the offending Party to sanctions, including dismissal of this case." Plaintiff's Complaint is noncompliant with the Court's Order because it requests "temporar[y], preliminar[y], and permanent[]" injunctive relief. (DE 1 at 68). Therefore, Plaintiff had until July 25, 2025 to file a compliant amended complaint, but it has not done so. Accordingly, upon a review of the record, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and CLOSED. See Chiron Recovery Ctr., LLC v. United Healthcare Servs., Inc., 438 F. Supp. 3d 1346, 1356 (S.D. Fla. 2020) ("When a party fails to comply with a court order, a court may dismiss the action.") (citing Zocaras v. Castro, 456 F.3d 479, 483 (11th Cir. 2006)); Ruth v. Deal, No. 5:18-cv-34, 2019 WL 3326238, at *1-3 (S.D. Ga. June 20, 2019) (after ordering plaintiff to file amended complaint to correct certain procedural errors and plaintiff failing to do so, sua sponte ordering clerk to dismiss complaint without prejudice pursuant to "Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) [and] the court's inherent authority to manage its docket") (citations omitted). Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 9/30/2025. 翻译 |
| 15 |
08/25/2025
|
PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING MOTIONS. THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery (DE 15) and Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Electronic Service of Process (DE 16) are REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Enjolique Lett for any appropriate action authorized by law. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 8/25/2025. 翻译 |
| 14 |
08/19/2025
|
NOTICE of Filing Proposed Order by Sega Corporation 翻译 |
| 13 |
08/14/2025
|
ORDER granting 8 Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Enjolique A. Lett on 8/14/2025. See attached document for full details. 翻译 |
| 12 |
08/11/2025
|
PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING MOTION. THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Certain Documents Under Seal (DE 8) is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Enjolique Lett for any appropriate action authorized by law. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 8/11/2025. 翻译 |
| 11 |
07/31/2025
|
Paperless Order. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Strike and Remove Inadvertent Filing (DE 10) ("Motion"). Plaintiff requests that the Court strike its most recently filed Corporate Disclosures Statement (DE 9), as the filing was made in error. Upon review of the Motion and the record, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion (DE 10) is GRANTED. The Corporate Disclosures Statement (DE 9) is STRICKEN. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 7/31/2025. 翻译 |
| 10 |
07/31/2025
|
Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike [9] Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - Inadvertent Filing by Sega Corporation. Responses due by 8/14/2025. 翻译 |
| 9 |
07/30/2025
|
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sega Corporation 翻译 |
| 8 |
07/22/2025
|
Renewed MOTION to Seal Certain Documents and Incorporated Memorandum of Law per Local Rule 5.4 by Sega Corporation. 翻译 |
| 7 |
07/22/2025
|
Plaintiff's RESPONSE to 6 Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other, Terminate Motions, by Sega Corporation. 翻译 |
| 6 |
07/18/2025
|
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES: It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that any currently pending motions are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with leave to refile such motions in compliance with the rules and procedures outlined below. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 7/18/2025. See attached document for full details. 翻译 |
| 5 |
07/17/2025
|
MOTION for Leave to File Certain Documents Under Seal by Sega Corporation. 翻译 |
| 4 |
07/15/2025
|
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sega Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Sega Sammy Holdings, Inc. for Sega Corporation 翻译 |
| 3 |
07/15/2025
|
FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK 翻译 |
| 2 |
07/14/2025
|
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. 翻译 |
| 1 |
07/14/2025
|
COMPLAINT against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-18615084, filed by Sega Corporation. 翻译 |