2025-cv-10852 案件实时进展-美国TRO临时禁令冻结案

2025-cv-10852 +组团 近期案件➥ 订阅

原告律所：David

品牌：Colette Sweeney 版权

小提示：专注TRO和解/应诉，需要起诉文件/被告名单/其他帮助可联系我们，微信右上角“···”可全文翻译/分享找队友/订阅可自动推送此案最新进展

微信扫码联系我们

-cv-

#	Date	Description
16	11/05/2025	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Plaintiff's motion [9] is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is denied in that the Court will not enter a temporary restraining order or a temporary asset restraint. The motion is granted in that the Court will enter an order for expedited discovery and permit service of process by email. Plaintiff's declaration [10-2] fails to include facts sufficient to establish a prima facie case of loss of goodwill and reputation which is necessary to demonstrate irreparable harm in this case. See Gabrielle Brianna Delgado v. The Partnerships etc. on Schedule A, 24-cv-11940, Dkt. # 17 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 19. 2024). The statements by Plaintiff are some evidence of loss of goodwill and reputation, but more objective evidence is necessary in order to grant an ex parte temporary restraining order. See, e.g., Spin Master Ltd. v. The Partnerships etc. on Schedule A, 24 C 3006, Dkt. # 16 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 17, 2024) (declaration containing allegations the Court found sufficient to establish irreparable harm from a copyright violation); Peanuts Worldwide LLC v. The Partnerships etc. on Schedule A, 24 C 8685, Dkt. # 17 (N.D. Ill Sept. 24, 2024) (same). Plaintiff shall submit a proposed expedited discovery order. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file excess pages [12] is granted. Mailed notice. 翻译
15	11/03/2025	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The Court requires that any motion for a temporary restraining order and/or asset freeze is accompanied by a declaration from an attorney of record that provides the following information. First, to demonstrate the immediate harm necessary to grant the drastic remedy of an ex parte temporary restraining order, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant has sold or offered to sell the allegedly infringing product(s) within the last two months and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Generally, evidence that a defendant has sold or offered to sell the infringing products within the last two months may include: (1) screenshots of the listings collected within the last two months; (2) screenshots older than two months with an attestation that the listings reflected in the screenshots have been checked within the last two months and were active; or (3) evidence of a purchase by a customer in Illinois within the last two months. Second, as relevant to personal jurisdiction, without which any temporary restraining order or asset freeze would be invalid, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant sold at least one allegedly infringing product to a customer in Illinois and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Here, "sold" means that the defendant accepted an order and payment for an allegedly infringing product to be shipped to Illinois. Third, to assure that Court that the rights of defendants who have not yet been served are being appropriately protected, the declaration must identify the case number(s) and assigned judge(s) for any pending case(s) brought by the plaintiff(s) against any of the named defendants, noting whether the intellectual property at issue was the same or different than in this case. If it is the same, the declaration should describe the disposition of the other case. The Court will address any motion for a temporary restraining order only after receipt of the described declaration, which can be filed contemporaneously with the motion. Additionally, to the extent Plaintiff also makes a motion for expedited discovery or for an order permitting electronic service of process, Plaintiff should submit a proposed order for that relief that is separate from the proposed order for the TRO and asset restraint. The proposed order for the TRO and asset restraint should name the relevant defendants directly in the order, without reference to Schedule A. Mailed notice 翻译
14	10/31/2025	MOTION by Plaintiff Colette Sweeny for leave to file excess pages 翻译
13	10/31/2025	SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Colette Sweeny Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Plaintiff 翻译
12	10/31/2025	MEMORANDUM by Colette Sweeny in support of motion for temporary restraining order[9] 翻译
11	10/31/2025	MOTION by Plaintiff Colette Sweeny for temporary restraining order 翻译
10	10/21/2025	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: A written status report is due by 11/21/2025. Mailed notice. 翻译
9	09/10/2025	EMAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC 翻译
8	09/09/2025	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion for leave to temporarily seal document [5] is granted. Mailed notice. 翻译
7	09/09/2025	CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. 翻译
6	09/09/2025	CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). 翻译
5	09/09/2025	MOTION by Plaintiff Colette Sweeny to seal document sealed document[2] 翻译
4	09/09/2025	ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Colette Sweeny by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr 翻译
3	09/09/2025	CIVIL Cover Sheet 翻译
2	09/09/2025	SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Colette Sweeny Schedule A to Complaint 翻译
1	09/09/2025	COMPLAINT filed by Colette Sweeny; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24036362. 翻译